Sentence examples for syntactic conditions from inspiring English sources

An alternative set of semantic and syntactic conditions of reduction bear a counterfactual interpretation.

In this setting, absence of direct information leakage is granted as soon as the initial process satisfies some syntactic conditions.

The use of this criterion eliminates the need for imposing syntactic conditions on Haskell type class and instance declarations and the need for using a recursion stack depth limit in order to guarantee termination of type inference in the presence of multi-parameter type classes, in case these syntactic conditions are chosen by programmers not to be enforced.

For instance, syntactic conditions in the form of limit relations and ceteris paribus assumptions have the function of explaining why the reduced theory works where it does and fails where it does not (Glymour 1969).

The use of this criterion eliminates the need of imposing syntactic conditions on Haskell type class and instance declarations in order to guarantee termination of type inference in the presence of multi-parameter type classes, and allows program compilation without the need of compiler flags for lifting such restrictions.

The use of this criterion eliminates the need for imposing syntactic conditions on Haskell type class and instance declarations in order to guarantee termination of type inference in the presence of multi-parameter type classes, and allows program compilation without the need of compiler flags for lifting such restrictions.

We propose a syntactic condition on a process p, ensuring that, during its execution, p is unable to synchronize two atomic sequences, not even indirectly; a process satisfying such a syntactic condition will be called well-formed.

Ambiguity is considered in Haskell as a syntactic condition on type expressions, conflicting with the standard semantically-related definition given above.

In Haskell, a syntactic condition on type expressions that characterizes overloading whose resolution cannot be further deferred (i.e., must have occurred), which we call overloading resolution condition characterizes also "type ambiguity".

It is a syntactic condition, that conflicts with the standard definition of ambiguity, based on the existence of distinct type system derivations of the same type for an expression.

In fully extended IF first-order logic any occurrences of ¬ are allowed which are subject to the following syntactic condition: if (Qx/W) is a quantifier in the syntactic scope of an occurrence of ¬, then all quantifiers listed in W are likewise in the syntactic scope of that occurrence of ¬. 31.