Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
All of the breast cytology reports evaluated in this study used a non-standardized descriptive narrative format instead of a standardized checklist-based synoptic format [ 23].
Similar(59)
To address these limitations, a synoptic reporting format (Fig. 2) has been developed and is recommended for adoption by KNH.
To address the limitations associated with narrative reporting of breast cytology results, KNH should adopt the recommended synoptic reporting format.
To address the limitations associated with narrative reporting of breast cytology results, a synoptic reporting format incorporating the United Kingdom's National Health Service Breast Screening Programme's diagnostic categories (C1 to C5) is recommended for adoption by this hospital.
Additionally, a cancer reporting project conducted in Ontario, Canada by Srigley et al. found that a province-wide implementation of a synoptic reporting format generated more complete reports and led to increased rates of cancer reporting [ 25].
Therefore, adoption of the recommended synoptic reporting format by KNH is expected to enhance the clinical utility of diagnostic breast cytology and promote standardization of breast pathology practices in Kenya.
It brings together in synoptic form much of what he's been doing for a quarter of a century.
Synoptic reporting incorporates free text into a structured format that allows for the data to also be represented as discrete elements.
This synoptic report contained the pathology data in a structured format with fields of interest listed on a single page enabling greater ease of interpretation over the traditional reports in prose.
Data for a synoptic approach can come from multiple sources and are found in a variety of formats including tabular data, computerized databases, and mathematical predictive models (Abbruzzese and Leibowitz 1997; Vellidis and others 2003a).
To obtain structured data, synoptic reports, i.e. predefined computer-based forms to record relevant procedures and findings in a structured, standardised format, have been shown to be advantageous [ 37- 39].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com