We have obtained the BAN clock synchronization precision of our system in three scenarios for re-synchronization periods of up to 16 minutes: (i) indoor with a temperature range of 25-26°C 25-26°Cion of 20.96 µ s, (ii) outdoor with a temprecisionrange of 17–20.96 precision of 60.46 µ s, (iii) outdoor with a temperature range of 22–27°C: precision of 23.46 µ s. .
In relation to the synchronization of expectations, our results reveal the following percentages: 33% for Spain and German, 7% for Spain and the Euro Area, 61% for Spain and the European Union, 41% for Germany and the Euro Area, 72% for Germany and the European Union, and 18% for the Euro Area and the European Union.
In order to analyze performance of estimators more comprehensively, we evaluate the synchronization probability of our proposed estimator and the CBTS [26], in CM1 and CM2, taking TFC1 and TFC3, respectively.
If there is no contention among the APs, how will they synchronize?We see the need of synchronization in our scheme in two stages.
Numerical simulations further validate the effectiveness and feasibility of our synchronization method.
In the current implementation such a round corresponds to a complete cycle of our synchronization algorithm.
Moreover, we discuss the contribution of stages 2 and 3 to the performance of our synchronization algorithm.
The simulation results discussed in this chapter should give an overview of the achievable quality of our synchronization approach.
In this section, we identify threats and propose countermeasures to strengthen the security of our synchronization system.
Another important and distinct feature of our synchronization scheme is that the communication energy consumption can be effectively decreased, since the communication network is utilized more efficiently.
