The phrase "synchronization in time" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the act of coordinating or aligning events or actions to occur at the same time. You can use it when discussing processes, events, or actions that need to be timed or coordinated with precision. An example sentence could be: "The success of the play relied on the synchronization in time of the actors' movements and the special effects."
Perfect synchronization in time and frequency is assumed.
Perfect synchronization in time and frequency is assumed, such that interference between neighboring RBs can be neglected as well.
Note that the time instances fall on top of each other implying an automatic synchronization in time between the distorted and original signal.
To perform such attack, full synchronization in time and frequency would be required in order to apply the same CDMA spreading code to the jamming signal.
Based on the characteristics of UL smart jamming, the attacker would require full synchronization in time and frequency with the LTE signal to be able to, for example, selectively jam the RACH.
Assuming perfect synchronization in time and frequency, the SINR of macrouser u m who is allocated RB b of macrocell (m{in }mathcal {M}) amounts to: gamma_{b,t}^{m}=frac{p_{b,t}^{m}h_{b,t}^{mu}}{sumlimits_{ninmathcal{M},nneq m}p_{b,t}^{n}h_{b,t}^{nu} + sumlimits_{finmathcal{F}}p_{b,t}^{f}h_{b,t}^{fu} + sigma^{2}} (1).
In this paper, the issue of synchronization in time-hopping IR-UWB systems employing pulse shape modulation is addressed and two low-complexity algorithms are compared.
Then, the chaos synchronization in time-delayed neuron system is studied based on the method of designing the coupled system and employing Krasovskii Lyapunov theory to search the synchronization conditions.
This paper considers the drive-response synchronization in finite time of competitive neural networks (CNNs) with different time scales, time-varying and infinite-time distributed delays (mixed delays), as well as uncertain non-linear perturbations.
In addition, the upper bound of the setting time of the global synchronization in finite time is explicitly evaluated.
It is assumed that there is no synchronization, neither in time, nor in frequency domain (as it is the most challenging scenario) between UL and flexible DL transmissions.
