Sentence examples for swapping conditions from inspiring English sources

Second, changes or mutations in the hinge loop and/or the contact interface of domains might destabilize the closed monomer due to steric or electrostatic effects and subsequently promote swapping conditions [26], [27].

Deletions may shorten the hinge loop and turn a closed monomer into an open oligomer [24], [25]; besides, mutations in the hinge loop and/or the contact interface of domains may promote swapping conditions [26], [27].

As mentioned in Section 3.1, the basis vectors are exchanged if swapping condition in (7) is not satisfied.

Later, Nieto and Rodríguez-López slightly modified the hypothesis of the previous result swapping condition (c) by the fact that ( X, d, ≼ ) is nondecreasing-regular in the following sense.

One of the interesting results in this direction was reported by Nieto and Rodríguez-López in [19], who slightly modified the hypothesis of the previous result swapping condition (c) with the fact that ( X, d, ≼ ) is nondecreasing-regular as follows.

It is clear from Figure 12 that DEEP performs the best in outputting the shortest reduced vectors, which are theoretically expected, since DEEP employs a strongest swapping condition to reinforce reducing the lengths of the reduced vectors [35].

Specifically, the permutation test transformed the average condition difference power value at each time point from decibels into a z value with respect to a null distribution of surrogate condition difference values, obtained by swapping condition labels for a random half of subjects at each of 1,000 permutations.

Our expectation was that capture would vary as a function of intertrial condition, such that RF-scaled proximity hemispheric effects would increase in the "swap" condition, but that static distractor costs possibly tied to perceptual filtering would remain the same in both "same" and "swap" conditions.

Critically, these factors did not interact [ F 4, 52) < 1], and planned follow-up t tests revealed that proximity had a significant effect on RT in each of the "same" [ F 4, 52) = 4.11, p =.006] and "swap" conditions [ F 4, 52) = 2.639, p =.044] when examined in isolation.

The students were randomly allocated to one condition for the first experiment on one day and then swapped condition for their second experiment on the second day.

The students were randomly allocated to one condition for the first experiment on 1 day and then swapped condition for their second experiment on the second day.