Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This species was found in water-related surface swabs of all 12 BMTU bathrooms, a nephrology wall swab (control), and water of two bathrooms (BR02, BR07).
Similar(59)
Figure 3C shows the mean ±2 SEMs of vRNA M gene copies per reaction (log10) at each examination time in UPG+ swabs, UPG– swabs, and control water.
Acetone swabs of control samples known to contain CN, tested positive for CN using the diphenylamine test.
There was no significant difference in M gene copies for UPG– swabs and control water.
In the nasal swabs from control gilts and newborn piglets, no IAV genetic material was found.
Cp. pecorum was confirmed by partial omp1 DNA sequencing of the nested PCR product of vaginal swabs from control cows.
Negative control swab samples were collected from 25 live, healthy, uninfected crows.
Similarly, fecal swab samples from control group showed cell counts of 10.17 ± 1.06 cells/mL at the baseline and 9.76 ± 0.33 cells/mL after 4 weeks (Table 2).
Prepared inocula of S. aureus ATCC 29213 (MSSA) and the clinical S. aureus MRSA strains D5 and A7 (1 × 10 CFU/mL) were spread with a sterile cotton swab on (a) control MHA or (b) MHA containing hop cone or spent hop extract or xanthohumol (at a final concentration of 1/2 MIC or 1/4 MIC).
Differences in M gene copies in UPG+ swabs (Figure 3E), control water (Figure 3F), and UPG– swabs (Figure 3G) followed different trends.
One study demonstrated the ability of an e-nose to differentiate swabs of various upper respiratory tract bacteria from control swabs [ 5].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com