Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
TB suspects were defined as individuals who had cough of ≥2 weeks OR two or more of the following symptoms: weight loss, fever, excessive night sweats and painless swelling of cervical or axillary lymph nodes of more than 2 weeks.
Pulmonary tuberculosis suspects were defined as persons with cough, sputum production or haemoptysis for 2-3 weeks.
First, ocular fundus pathology was evaluated by ophthalmoscopes other than photography; and glaucoma suspects were defined only as cup-to-disc ratio of 0.6 or higher.
Similar(57)
In China, pulmonary tuberculosis suspects are defined as persons with cough, sputum production or haemoptysis for 2-3 weeks.
Concurrent infection (proven or suspected) was defined as an acute febrile illness that occurred after TB diagnosis and that presented with a sepsis-like syndrome manifested by two or more of the following conditions: heart rate >90/min, respiratory rate >20 breaths/min, temperature >38°C or <36°C, white cell count >12 000 cells/mm3 or <4 000 cells/mm3 [15].
A tuberculosis suspect was defined as a person with a reported cough for 20 days or more, or with reported cough of unspecified duration.
A TB suspect was defined as somebody presenting at the clinic with a cough of more than 3 weeks and/or symptoms of haemoptysis.
A 'TB suspect' was defined as a patient with symptoms or signs of pulmonary or extra pulmonary TB and/or constitutional symptoms (loss of appetite, weight loss, fever and fatigue).
The Government set targets to be achieved by 2000 for NHS Trusts in England and Wales to see patients with suspected cancer within two weeks of an urgent referral by their GP [ 1], where "suspected" was defined as either a perceived level of probability or a hunch [ 2].
TB suspects here were defined as patients who had persistent cough for more than two weeks [ 7, 16].
In humans, suspected cases were defined as neurologic symptoms of encephalitis or meningoencephalitis or acute neurologic symptoms with fever.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com