Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Although susceptibility standards are not available for this organism, it was considered susceptible to penicillin and ampicillin by combining the disk-diffusion test with the MICs, as determined by the Etest (0.06 mg/L for penicillin, 0.023 mg/L for ampicillin).
However, susceptibility standards are not available because A. pyogenes rarely causes disease in humans.
Despite that, and in the face of growing evidence of EMI in the literature, there have been no substantial changes to EMI susceptibility standards for medical devices in the last decade.
Similar(57)
Data were interpreted according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute antimicrobial susceptibility testing standards, where available.
The MIC tests were performed by a broth microdilution method according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing standards (EUCAST, http://www.eucast.org).org
Details of laboratory methodology (antibiotic susceptibility testing standards, selection criteria for typing, typing methodology, phenotypic/genotypic test systems, different sensitivity rates) have not been documented and may vary between different laboratories.
Accordingly, the redefined grades of the scoring indices were assigned points from 0 to 5. The modified susceptibility grading standard is presented in Table 6.
Clinical isolates were confirmed as S. aureus, and were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by standard techniques.
Escherichia coli isolates from these waters were tested for antibiotic susceptibility, by standard Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method using Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute breakpoints.
Therefore, high temperature shows some effects only toward the drug susceptibility of standard or laboratory strain K1 or 3D7 but not to field isolate.
We tested for phylogenetic signal in pesticide susceptibility using a standard measure of phylogenetic signal: Blomberg's K (Blomberg et al. 2003).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com