Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(11)
References. 1. Puxty K, McLoone P, Quasim T, Kinsella J, Morrison D. Survival in solid cancer patients following intensive care unit admission.
TP53 mutations within the DNA-binding domain have been associated with poor treatment response and shorter survival in solid tumors.
Association of mir-124-3 mir-124-3 mir-124-3 reCGIrence-free survival in solid tumethylationur knowledge, handnot been described as yet.
Recently, a meta-analysis, comprising 12,754 patients, of the association of blood PLR and overall survival in solid tumors concluded that high PLR was independently associated with shorter OS in various solid tumors [ 42].
For this meta-analysis, the results indicated that high expression of miR-200c in circulation and low expression of miR-200c in tumor tissue were associated with worse survival in solid tumors.
This combination has been shown to generate significant short-term radiological response rates and improvement in survival in solid tumours, most notably in small-cell lung cancer (Noda et al, 2002, Ilson et al, 2003; Souid et al, 2003).
Similar(49)
Pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in many solid tumors.
Radiomic features characterise tumour phentotypes through extraction of high-dimensional data [5] and can be associated with metastatic growth, recurrence and survival in several solid cancers [6].
Hyponatremia has been associated with poor survival in many solid tumors and more recently found to be of prognostic and predictive value in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with immunotherapy.
Elevated OPN levels have been shown to correlate with increased tumor progression and poor survival in many solid tumors [6].
By virtue of its immunosuppressive effects, FTY720 has also been demonstrated to improve allograft survival in various solid organ allo-transplant models such as liver [28] and intestine [29].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com