Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

surprised to learn

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"surprised to learn" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to express the feeling of being surprised after discovering something unexpected. Example: I was surprised to learn that the movie was based on a book.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They were surprised to learn that rents had soared citywide.

News & Media

The New York Times

I was surprised to learn what I didn't yet know.

News & Media

The New York Times

They might be surprised to learn that I'm from Venus".

News & Media

Independent

A critical father, I wouldn't be surprised to learn.

News & Media

Independent

Coleman was surprised to learn that Fadl wasn't particularly religious.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Afterward, she was surprised to learn that this wasn't normal.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Ahmed was surprised to learn that she was only 64.

He's surprised to learn about Preston's unhealthy – and unwelcome – accolade.

News & Media

The Guardian

Most biologists will be surprised to learn this.

Guardian readers won't be surprised to learn it's not mine.

I was really surprised to learn it was that old.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Vary your vocabulary by using synonyms like "astonished", "amazed", or "startled" to add nuance to your writing.

Common error

Avoid repetitive use of "surprised to learn" within a short passage. This can make your writing sound monotonous. Instead, employ a range of expressions like "taken aback", "astonished", or rephrase the sentence entirely to convey surprise in different ways.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "surprised to learn" functions as an adjective phrase, expressing a state of being surprised upon acquiring new information. Ludwig AI validates this usage with numerous real-world examples. It commonly introduces a clause that details the surprising information.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "surprised to learn" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to express astonishment upon discovering new information. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and general writing. While highly adaptable, it's advisable to avoid overuse and consider related phrases like "astonished to learn" or "startled to learn" to enhance writing variety. Pay attention to the register, ensuring it aligns with the intended audience. By understanding these nuances, writers can effectively convey surprise and engage their readers. The phrase is prevalent in authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian, affirming its reliability and widespread acceptance.

FAQs

How can I use "surprised to learn" in a sentence?

"Surprised to learn" is typically followed by a "that" clause or an infinitive phrase. For example, "I was surprised to learn that he was the director" or "She was surprised to learn about the new policy".

What are some alternatives to "surprised to learn"?

You can use alternatives like "startled to learn", "astonished to learn", or "amazed to discover" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "surprised to know" instead of "surprised to learn"?

While "surprised to know" is grammatically correct, "surprised to learn" is more common when referring to the acquisition of new information. "Surprised to know" is better suited when expressing surprise at a pre-existing fact.

What's the difference between "surprised to hear" and "surprised to learn"?

"Surprised to hear" implies that you received the information through auditory means (e.g., someone told you), while "surprised to learn" is more general and can refer to discovering information through any means (reading, observation, etc.).

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: