Sentence examples for surface of dust from inspiring English sources
The phrase "surface of dust" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a thin layer of dust that covers a surface, often implying neglect or lack of cleanliness.
Example: "The old bookshelf was covered with a thick surface of dust, indicating it hadn't been touched in years."
Alternatives: "layer of dust" or "coating of dust".
The image appears to be clipped from a home movie, an effect that is achieved by incorporating a mottled surface of dust and scratch marks.
This happens in particular on the surface of dust particles in the range between 200 and 400°C.
Charging of dust (positive or negative) depends upon the charging processes (e.g., photoionization, secondary electron emission, thermionic emission or by electron ion bombardments on surface of dust particles).
The flow of O2 molecules encountering the surface of dust particles or active oxygen atoms and compounds might accelerate the formation rate of magnetite during atmospheric entry.
Papers on other dust-related topics, for example, the formation of molecules and their reactions on and their desorption from the surface of dust particles, are also welcome.
Collisions between ions and atoms as well as ionization also essentially affect the formation of the ion flux onto the surface of dust particles.
Perhaps life could develop through chemical reactions on the surfaces of dust grains in the brown dwarf's atmosphere, or perhaps it gained a foothold after arriving as a hitchhiker on an asteroid.
Molecules formed by reactions on the surfaces of dust grains are also best detected by millimeter-wave observations of sources in which the products of grain-surface chemistry have been deposited into the gas phase.
This re-formation takes place on the surfaces of dust grains, but the exact conditions under which this occurs are important components in the interpretation of observational data.
Fischer-Tropsch-type reactions leading to the formation of CH4 may then occur on the surfaces of dust condensates in the expanding impact vapor cloud (Sekine et al., 2006).
They suggested that the variations in a controlled laboratory setting were minimal when compared to those in field applications, where factors such as variations in sampling area, sampling technique (pressure applied, speed of sampling), distribution of spores on the surface, presence of dust or soil, or physical or chemical properties of the surface could further reduce recovery.
