Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
On the other-hand, supposing that (2.6) is valid, by (2.11) and (1.2) (for, it follows. If, then (2.7) is naturally valid; if, setting (2.14).
That is all that's valid here.
That's valid.
On the other hand, suppose that (3.1) is valid.
Inductively suppose that (11) is valid for m = k > n, each t > 0 and n ≥ n 0 + 2.
On the other hand, suppose that (13) is valid, setting begin{aligned} g y):=|y|^{plambda_{2}-1} biggl[ int_{-infty}^{infty}h bigl( x^{infty }h bigl) f(x^{deltaggr] ^{p-1}yquadbigr(yin mathbf{R} backslash{0} bigr), end{aligned} then we find (J=|g|_{q,psi}^{q}).
Suppose that (3.1) is valid.
Suppose that (1.16) is valid for (s= s_1) and (s= s_2), Since (by eqs.
Supposing that the valid response rate is 95% based on our previous survey experience, we enlarged the sample size to 260 patients for each group.
However, while there is evidence to support this for metastatic colorectal cancer (Kuramochi et al, 2006), there is little evidence to suppose that this is a valid approach to inform the biology of NSCLC brain metastases.
We suppose that the result is valid for all m × m ( m < n and n ≥ 3 ) K-matrices, let k be the cardinality of α.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com