supported by proof

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "supported by proof" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evidence or validation for a claim, argument, or statement. Example: "The theory is supported by proof from multiple scientific studies that confirm its validity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Dewani's family say there is no evidence of a connection between Tongo and Dewani and that most aspects of the case are not supported by proof.

The Guardian

The cases held that a conviction of an individual of illegal possession of unregistered firearms had to be supported by proof that his possession was 'willing and conscious' and that he knew the items possessed were firearms.

Cornell University

This will only happen, however, if it steps up to its responsibility to produce, market, and sell products that are supported by proof of effectiveness and safely, and authentically represent the remarkable discoveries that are being made in nutritional science.

HuffPost

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The core components of the architecture are described supported by a proof of concept demonstrator evaluated in real organizational contexts.

Computers in Industry

According to the classic evidentialist argument, for faith to be considered rational it has to be supported by independent proof, and there simply isn't any.

The New York Times - Arts

This claim in turn is supported by his proof of the existence of God, together with the assertion that God, because he is not a deceiver, would not cause Descartes to be deceived in what he clearly and distinctly perceives.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He would have been very happy if all the fundamental beliefs (sherashim) of true religion could be supported by rational proof, as are, in his opinion, the beliefs in God's existence, oneness and immateriality.

SEP

Identification of cases in the Exeter studies was generally straightforward, with a high percentage of cases supported by histological proof.

British Journal of Cancer

Computational methods are thought to be prerequisite for the analysis of whole genomes for predicting S/MARs and though several tools like MarWiz [ 11- 13], Marscan [ 8], ChrClass [ 14], SMARtest [ 15] and SIDD [ 16, 17] have been developed for this purpose, prediction of S/MAR is not conclusive unless it has been supported by experimental proof.

BMC Genomics

This idea is supported by the proof-theoretical approach described here, as shown in the formal proof φ2 in Section 3, where Newton's law of motion was not merely a statement; it was used as a principle of inference, in the form of a definition inference rule.

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Convergence analysis of the algorithm is performed and supported by rigorous proofs.

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "supported by proof", ensure that the nature and source of the proof are clearly indicated to enhance credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "supported by proof" if the evidence is weak or circumstantial. Overstating the strength of the supporting evidence can undermine your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "supported by proof" functions as a post-modifier, describing the state of a claim, theory, or argument. Ludwig confirms that it is used to emphasize that something is not just based on opinion but on demonstrable evidence.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "supported by proof" is a grammatically correct and usable expression in English, employed to signify that a claim or statement is validated by solid evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage aims to convey credibility and trustworthiness. Although not exceedingly common, it appears across various contexts, including science, news, and academic writing. For alternative phrasing, consider "backed by evidence" or "substantiated by evidence", and always ensure that the strength of the 'proof' aligns with the actual evidence provided.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

backed by evidence

Emphasizes the presence of factual support, implying a more general form of validation than a formal "proof".

supported by facts

A more direct and simple way of saying something has factual backing.

substantiated by evidence

Highlights that the claim has been strengthened or confirmed through the provision of supporting evidence.

corroborated by data

Suggests confirmation through factual information, particularly numerical or statistical.

validated by research

Focuses on confirmation through systematic investigation and scholarly inquiry.

confirmed by findings

Indicates that the claim has been verified through specific discoveries or results.

verified by analysis

Suggests a rigorous examination has been conducted to establish the truth or accuracy.

justified by results

Suggests that outcomes or consequences provide a valid reason or basis for the claim.

underpinned by rationale

Emphasizes the logical basis or reasoning that supports the statement.

grounded in reality

Implies the claim is based on tangible or verifiable aspects of the real world, rather than abstract concepts.

FAQs

What does "supported by proof" mean?

The phrase "supported by proof" means that a statement, claim, or theory is backed by solid evidence that confirms its validity. It indicates that there is concrete substantiation, not just speculation or belief.

How do I use "supported by proof" in a sentence?

You can use "supported by proof" to indicate that an assertion is validated by evidence. For instance: "The hypothesis is "backed by evidence" from multiple studies."

What can I say instead of "supported by proof"?

Alternatives include "substantiated by evidence", "corroborated by data", or "validated by research", depending on the context.

Is "supported by proof" the same as "supported by evidence"?

While similar, "supported by proof" implies a stronger, more conclusive form of validation than "supported by evidence". "Proof" often suggests a higher standard of certainty.