Interestingly, very high F-value for depth of the tunnel (table 1) supports significant difference in the level of depth of burrows of M. budooga and M. terricolor reflecting difference in hypoxic/hypercapnic conditions among burrows.
The hypothesis of multiple HGT of blocks of genes is also supported by significant differences in codon usage for proline and arginine between this subset of genes and other M. abscessus genes (p<10−4, chi-squared test).
It has been previously supported by significant differences in their physiological and genetic characteristics [ 65, 66].
All the other categories from the original study were supported by significant differences in the items of the POS.
Mean differences in SF-36 mental health scores were significant between the feeding groups, but relatively small in magnitude 58 and not supported by significant differences in any of the specific psychological outcome measures (such as symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder); such differences should therefore be cautiously interpreted.
Known-groups validity was partially supported with significant differences in SCI-R total by HbA1c (≤7.5% (58 mmol/mol): 72 ± 11, >7.5% (58 mmol/mol): 68 ± 14, p < 0.05) and diabetes duration (≤16 years: 67 ± 13, >16 years: 71 ± 12, p < 0.001) but not by presence/absence of complications or by insulin treatment algorithm.
Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha =.96) and subscale internal consistency ranged from alpha.36 to.79 providing evidence for a strong overall construct and some multi-dimensionality. Validity was supported by significant differences in mean EDQLS according to severity levels on the EDI-2 (F = 95.3, p <.001) and the BSI (F = 86.9, p <.001).
The usefulness and definition of functional types has been debated, but there is much support for significant differences in key traits among plants of different functional types (e.g. Wright et al., 2005 a, b ; Asner and Martin, 2012).
An analysis of accuracy for words in Position 1 suggested that both groups were less accurate on negative rather than neutral category words [ F 1,38) = 5.11, p = 0.03], however comparisons did not support significant accuracy differences between emotional and neutral words in either group (p >.1).
Our study does not support a significant difference in predicting ability between waist circumference and BMI.
