Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
To that end Hunter's bill would formally incorporate the concept of harm reduction into the FDA's mission by requiring it to support less-dangerous nicotine delivery products.
But while there are serious and unanswered public health questions around e-cigarettes, some proponents warn that overly strict regulations may discourage smokers from making the switch to a product that leading medical experts and a wealth of scientific research is coming to support as a much less dangerous alternative to smoking and a potential boon in the fight against tobacco.
Pfizer withdrew Bextra seven months later, but left Celebrex on the market, contending that it was less dangerous — a decision that was supported by the Food and Drug Administration on the overwhelming recommendation of a federal advisory panel.
The only one that doesn't support a broadly conservative social and economic agenda is the "cannabis is less dangerous than alcohol" party.
Is it less dangerous?
It's less dangerous.
Does that make it less dangerous?
"It's less dangerous," he said.
It was infinitely less dangerous".
They are no less dangerous.
That made it no less dangerous.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com