The phrase "support facts" is not a common or correct part of a sentence in written English.
It is possible to use the phrase "supporting facts" to refer to additional evidence or information that reinforces a claim or argument. Example of a sentence using "supporting facts": "The author provided several supporting facts to back up their main argument in the essay."
The sentences expressing these epistemic relations express facts — call them epistemic support facts.
If they do, then even Chisholm can plausibly maintain that epistemic support facts are natural facts.
(If reliabilists admit that there are epistemic support facts, then they too must account for their status).
If the epistemic support facts are natural facts, and justification is defined in terms of evidence possessed and epistemic support, then justification is defined in entirely natural terms.
If the epistemic support facts are not natural facts, then not all epistemic facts are natural facts and, according to traditionalists, substantive epistemological naturalism is false.
If traditionalists say that there is a special sort of grasping or understanding or acquaintance with epistemic support facts and naturalists deny that there is any such thing, it is seriously misleading to attribute some sort of non-naturalism to the traditionalists.
–Build an argument for your opinion using supporting facts and statements of reasonable opinion.
Blaming Veolia for the tragedy in Flint is unfounded with zero supporting facts.
The details, supporting facts or funny stories are truly what make the letter.
Filtering is promoted in conjunction with online data processing and intelligent data analysis supporting fact-based decision.
It is also crucial for any information system application making use of automatically generated text knowledge bases in a reliable way, e.g., by inferentially supported fact retrieval.
