Your English writing platform
Free sign upSimilar(60)
To be more precise, (V^{varepsilon }) is the closure, with respect to the (H^{1}( Omega_{1 varepsilon}))-norm, of the set of the functions in (C^{infty}(Omega_{1 varepsilon})) with a compact support contained in Ω.
We consider a continuous function with the support contained in and (3.2).
By setting (v = e_i ) on ([a-2varepsilon, b+2varepsilon ]), (v = 0) outside ([a-3varepsilon, b+3varepsilon ]), we can let (u_{n}) be a smooth approximation to (mathbf {1}_{[a,b]}e_j), with support contained in ([a-varepsilon, b+varepsilon ]).
Let (mathcal{D}(Omega)) be the space of (mathcal{C}^{infty}) functions with compact support contained in Ω.
Let (psiin C^{infty}(mathbb{R}^{n})) be real, radial, have support contained in ({x:|x|le1}), and (int_{mathbb{R}^{n}}psi(x),dx=0).
Theorem 2.1 Assume that m 0 = u 0 − u 0 x x has compact support, contained in the interval [ α m 0, β m 0 ], and that ρ 0 is also compactly supported, with support contained in [ α ρ 0, β ρ 0 ].
Since q x ≥ 0 and ρ 0 is compactly supported, it follows from this relation that ρ ( ⋅, t ) is compactly supported for all times t ∈ [ 0, T ), with support contained in the interval [ q ( α ρ 0, t ), q ( β ρ 0, t ) ]. Setting α = min { α m 0, α ρ 0 }, β = max { β m 0, β ρ 0 }.
Due to d d t m ( q ( x, t ), t ) q x k 1 ( x, t ) = 0, on x ∈ R − [ α ρ 0, β ρ 0 ], it follows that m ( ⋅, t ) is compactly supported, with its support contained in the interval [ q ( α, t ), q ( β, t ) ], for all t ∈ [ 0, T ). □. In order to prove Theorem 2.3, we will use the following result. Lemma 2.2 [9].
So y is compactly supported with its support contained in the interval [ q ( α, t ), q ( β, t ) ]. Therefore the following functions are well defined: E + ( t ) = ∫ R e x y ( x, t ) d x and E − ( t ) = ∫ R e − x y ( x, t ) d x, with E + ( t ) = ∫ R e x y 0 d x = 0 and E − ( t ) = ∫ R e − x y 0 d x = 0. (4.1).
For any set (Ksubsetmathbb{R}), the subspace (M^{gamma}_{K}) of (M^{gamma}) is defined as the set of functions (uin M^{gamma}) with support contained in K: begin{aligned} M^{gamma}_{K}=M^{gamma}_{K}( mathbb{R};X_{0},X_{1})= bigl{ psiin M ^{gamma}, operatorname{supp}psisubseteq K bigr}.
In addition to support contained in the published literature, the cooperative relationships relating to chromatin modifications are indirectly supported by partial correlation analysis based on experimental data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com