supplies to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "supplies to" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be a typographical error or a misphrasing of "applies to," which is used to indicate relevance or applicability. Example: "This rule applies to all employees regardless of their position."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He then gave school supplies to children.

The New York Times

Electricity supplies to the capital are failing.

The New York Times

It will be problematic for gas supplies to Western Europe.

Independent

The authorities had already cut electricity supplies to the site.

The New York Times

It is also increasing supplies to the Northern Alliance.

The Economist

& 38 St. supplies to its left-handed depositors.

The New Yorker

Never transfer cleaning supplies to unmarked or emptied food containers.

The New York Times

program to send medicine and medical supplies to the North.

The New York Times

Gazprom also benefits from guaranteed gas supplies to Ukraine.

The Economist

Russian craft also deliver supplies to the station.

The Economist

Lucky we always had enough supplies to take many breaks.

The Guardian - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to providing items, consider using more precise terms like "supply of", "delivery of", or "provision of" to enhance clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using "supplies to" as it often requires a more specific preposition or phrasing. Instead of saying "supplies to schools", opt for "supplies for schools" or "supply of materials to schools" for improved grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "supplies to" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase. However, it is often considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI identifies it as a misphrasing, suggesting alternatives may be more appropriate.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Wiki

24%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Science

9%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "supplies to" is frequently used but generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as a misphrasing, suggesting it's often better to use alternatives like "supply of", "supplies for", or "delivery of supplies" depending on the specific context. While it appears across various sources, including News & Media and Wiki, it's advisable to avoid it in formal writing. Paying attention to the intended meaning and choosing more precise prepositions can significantly improve clarity and grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

supply of

Focuses on the availability of supplies from a source.

provision of supplies for

Emphasizes the act of providing supplies for a specific purpose or entity.

delivery of supplies to

Highlights the action of delivering supplies to a destination.

allocation of resources for

Focuses on allocating resources specifically for supplies.

distribution of goods to

Refers to the distribution of goods, often in a broader context than just supplies.

offering of provisions to

Implies a formal or charitable offering of provisions.

furnishing of equipment for

Highlights equipping something or someone with needed supplies.

aid distribution to

Specifically refers to distributing aid, which can include supplies.

logistical support for

Implies providing logistical support which includes the handling of supplies.

stockpiling of provisions

Refers to gathering and storing a reserve of supplies.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically correct alternative to "supplies to"?

Consider using phrases like "supply of", "supplies for", or "delivery of supplies" depending on the context.

Is it ever correct to use the phrase "supplies to" in formal writing?

Generally, no. While the phrase might appear in some contexts, it's usually better to opt for a more precise and grammatically sound alternative such as "provisions for" or "resources for".

How can I ensure I'm using the correct preposition when talking about providing supplies?

Pay close attention to the context. If you're emphasizing the origin or source, "supply from" might be appropriate. If you're focusing on the recipient, "supplies for" or "deliveries to" could be better choices.

What's the difference between saying "supplies to a location" versus "supplies for a location"?

While "supplies to a location" isn't standard, "supplies for a location" implies that the supplies are intended for use or distribution within that location. It's a more grammatically accepted way to express the idea.