Sentence examples for supplementary methodological from inspiring English sources

That convergence, they propose, comes mainly from the peer-review side, which increasingly requires additional data reporting and supplementary methodological information for online publication a trend they say serves public needs for data transparency and better communication of scientific concepts.

Recent industry guidance [ 2] encourages the use of cumulative distribution function (CDF) plots, which present the percentage of responders at each score change value, as a supplementary methodological approach to HRQoL responder analyses.

However, the research included a second independent researcher coding the data (investigator triangulation) and a supplementary component (methodological triangulation) to minimise researcher bias in this qualitative study.

For all figures based on GBD 2010 data, we calculate 95% uncertainty intervals based on the 95% uncertainty intervals as reported in GBD 2010 (please refer to the methodological appendix, Supplementary file 1, for details).

Of these 30 diseases, we exclude four diseases which are not included in GBD 2010, and for which we therefore lack comparable disease burden data (see methodological appendix, Supplementary file 1, for details).

The outcomes, interventions, and quality assessments of the included studies are shown in Table 2 and Supplementary Material 2. For methodological quality assessment, the majority of trials (10 trials) had adequate sequence generation for randomization but only two trials had adequate allocation concealment (Supplementary Material 2).

Online supplementary table S2 describes the methodological quality of the included studies.

In general all studies assessed in this review were subject to one or more forms of methodological bias (online supplementary table S2).

The main analysis of the LRP, evaluating amplitudes at peak latency, contradicts findings reported by Touzalin-Chretien and coworkers and corroborates our view that the latter results are due to methodological problems (see Supplementary Material).

The results varied little by methodological assumption (see supplementary table S6), using estimates per 250 mL/day (median of 17 studies) rather than per serving/day; excluding studies with a high risk of potential bias or with relatively large within person dietary variability; and incorporating uncertainty of within person variability and precision of type 2 diabetes diagnosis.

The overall methodological quality was moderate (Supplementary Table 2).