Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Table 6 Summary of inputs and assumptions used in the techno-economic analysis (base case) Input Value Comment Required CO2 capture efficiency 30%% Required capture efficiency if CO2 emissions are to be maintained at 1,990 value PBR cost, $/L (raw materials) 0.55 Custom design, PETG and PVC parts.
Similar(59)
Tables 1 and 2 show a summary of input parameters and treatment costs for the simulated scenarios.
Finally, all of the parameters were rasterized and analysed in GIS platform in order to generate a coseismic landslide susceptibility model (Fig. 5) and the summary of input data can be seen in Table 2.
The LCA database ecoinvent was relied on for a substantial share of the required data for the life-cycle inventory (LCI2) and upstream processes, though it was supplemented with real data wherever possible (see also section "Summary of input data").
Table 1 Summary of input data used in the model Subgroup Value (lower and upper CI) Reference Baseline risk of hospitalisation CHD infants 9.7%7.4%4%, 12.0%)† Feltes et al. 2003 [5] CLD infants 12.8% (8.8%, 16.8%)† IMPACT, 1998 [6] Preterm: <29 wGA 10.00% (0.7%, 19.3%)† MedImmune/Abbott, Data on File.
A complete summary of input parameters is presented in the Additional file 1: Table S3.
In the console, enter there commands: objects.get("PWq7mHEWjyFReXDV") # (for Kuopio) objects.get("AOqn0FIvJu1Wxidg") # (for Basel) objects.get("V3K6ePJVE3oinNyP") # (for Kuopio importance analysis with 1000 iterations) Additional file 1: Summaries of input data used in the model.
Table 5 Summary of model inputs and output.
A summary of all inputs used in the model is provided in Table 1.
(PDF 52 KB) 13561_2014_26_MOESM2_ESM.pdf Additional file 2: Appendix B: Summary of cost inputs.
A summary of the inputs to each of the projection-specified populations of dopamine neurons assayed (using the injection scheme from Figure 1G ) normalized such that the 1500 neurons were randomly sampled from each brain.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com