Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Indices were built via the sum of each scale, and thus values range from 4 to 24.
Similar(59)
CFA models were tested for each of the 10 scales and for the complete KIDSCREEN measure using the sums of each scale.
These cut-off scores represent a specific value of the total sum score of each scale and are used to distinguish between companies with or without health promotion willingness and health promotion management.
Consequently, the summed score of each scale can be considered a sufficient statistic for the trait being measured.
A trauma scale score of 36 (the sum of each item in the scale with a maximum possible score of 105) was the symptom criterion for eligibility.
(8) Lodging index (Lodg): based on Caldicott and Nutall [ 32], which describes the lodging index as the sum of the product of each scale of lodging (0 5) and its percentage divided by five.
The overall GAS score for the total health promotion project increased from 16.02 at baseline (sum of scale scores = -30, average scale score = -2) to 54.53 at one year (sum of scale scores = +4, average scale score = +0.27) showing project goals were achieved above the expected level.
Results are presented as the mean of each scale (sum of 5 questions/5) and the mean subtotal score (sum of 20 questions/20); hence, ranking ranges are from 1 to 5. In this study, we used the validated Spanish version of the instrument [ 13].
The computed baseline GAS score for the total program was 16.02 (sum of scale scores = -30, average scale score = -2.00) and improved to 54.53 at 12 months (sum of scale scores = +4, average scale score = +0.27, median = 0; mode = 0) showing overall goal achievement above the expected level.
The item-total correlation was evaluated using Spearman's non-parametric correlation coefficient between each item and the sum of all scale items.
Each phase is further simplified as 2-phase composite material composed of matrix phase (zero porosity) and pore phase (the sum of various scale pores).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com