sum allocated for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "sum allocated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific amount of money that has been designated for a particular purpose or project. Example: "The sum allocated for the new community center will cover construction and maintenance costs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Earlier in the month, North Yorkshire's Police and Crime Commissioner Julia Mulligan said the six-figure sum allocated for policing could leave her with a £1m bill.

BBC

North Yorkshire's police and crime commissioner said the six-figure sum allocated for policing was not adequate and could leave her with a £1m bill.

BBC

This represented half of the annual sum allocated for collecting historical manuscripts, and the state was hesitant to agree.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

The prize fund rate - the amount allocated for winnings - has been raised from 3.15% of the total sum invested to 3.40%.

The Guardian - Money

That's exactly the sum allocated to Bristol from the government's £150m capital fund for universal infant free school meals (UIFSM), so it seems that this council will not be dipping into its cash to implement a national policy unexpectedly imposed upon it last November.

The Guardian

Palka's debut feature, made for $200,000£110,00000), with about the same sum again allocated for distribution (actually, self-distribution: very few independent films sold at Sundance this year), is a fine calling-card movie for a writer-director-actor.

The Guardian - Film

Referring to the sum allocated by the government, he added: "That, I'm afraid to say, will not help us".

BBC

Stylianides said the money would go "wherever the needs are greatest", although no specific sum has been allocated for Greece.

The Guardian

As I return to civilian life, a final small sum will be allocated for an inscription above the main entrance to the royal palace.

The Guardian - Opinion

The sums allocated to each level of government are now published, and there has been some progress in curbing graft.

The Economist

Incredibly, only in the following year are those lump sums allocated to specific individuals' accounts.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing budgets or financial planning, use "sum allocated for" to clearly indicate the amount of money designated for a specific purpose. This makes the allocation transparent and easily understood.

Common error

Ensure the purpose of the allocation is clearly defined when using "sum allocated for". Vague descriptions can lead to misunderstandings about how the money should be spent.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sum allocated for" functions as a noun phrase followed by a prepositional phrase. It identifies a specific quantity of resources that have been designated for a particular purpose. This is supported by Ludwig's examples, where it's used to describe amounts set aside for policing, manuscript collection, or other specific needs.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Wiki

11%

Science

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "sum allocated for" is a grammatically correct and understandable way to denote the amount of money or resources designated for a specific purpose. Ludwig AI shows it is more commonly used in news and media, as well as in scientific or formal business contexts. It communicates financial distributions with clarity and precision. Remember to clearly define the purpose of the allocation to avoid ambiguity in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

funds designated for

Replaces "sum" with "funds" and "allocated" with "designated", slightly altering the formality.

budget assigned for

Substitutes "sum" with "budget" implying a planned financial resource and "allocated" with "assigned".

amount earmarked for

Replaces "sum" with "amount" and "allocated" with "earmarked", suggesting a specific financial designation.

resources allocated to

Shifts the focus to "resources" instead of "sum", broadening the scope beyond just money, and uses "to" instead of "for".

financial provision for

Uses more formal terms like "financial provision", indicating a planned allocation.

grant approved for

Specifically refers to a "grant", implying an application and approval process.

allowance designated for

Replaces "sum" with "allowance", implying a regular or set amount.

appropriation for

Uses the term "appropriation", which refers to funds formally set aside by a legislative body.

monies allocated for

Uses the archaic term "monies" instead of "sum", which can add a formal tone.

funding provided for

Focuses on the act of "funding" rather than the specific amount.

FAQs

What is an alternative to "sum allocated for" that implies a formal designation of funds?

You could use alternatives such as "funds designated for" or "budget assigned for", which both suggest a planned and approved allocation of resources.

How can I use "sum allocated for" in a sentence about project funding?

You might say, "The "sum allocated for" the research project will cover equipment costs and personnel salaries."

What's the difference between "sum allocated for" and "amount earmarked for"?

"Sum allocated for" generally refers to an amount officially designated for use, whereas "amount earmarked for" suggests that the funds are set aside for a specific purpose, but the allocation might not be completely finalized.

Is "sum allocated to" grammatically correct instead of "sum allocated for"?

While "sum allocated to" isn't incorrect, "sum allocated for" is more commonly used when specifying the purpose or beneficiary of the allocated funds. "Sum allocated to" typically suggests a direct recipient, whereas "for" indicates the intended use.