Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The FME technique results show that five of the sampled groundwater (S1, S3, S4, S5, and S6) are suitable of drinking water directly while the well (S2) is unsuitable for drinking unless treated.
Similar(59)
The remaining 33%% of samples were not suitable for drinking.
Based on the WQI classification, only 38% of samples are perfectly suitable for drinking purpose.
It was observed that the quality of groundwater is not suitable for drinking.
It was also observed that the quality of groundwater was not suitable for drinking purpose in industrial and irrigation area.
It was observed that the quality of groundwater was not suitable for drinking purpose in industrial area.
Based on the total hardness and TDS, 96%% of groundwater samples are found suitable for drinking purpose.
Most of the groundwater samples were not suitable for drinking based on the EC (Table 2).
The concentration of fluoride is within the permissible limit and is suitable for drinking.
Based on the WQI results majority of the samples are falling under excellent to good category and suitable for drinking water purposes.
Based on the WQI classification majority of the samples are falling under excellent to good water category and suitable for drinking water purposes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com