Standard tables and harvest plots were found to be rated equally, although neutrally, in terms of suitability and ease of understanding to summarize complex data from overviews of reviews.
The present work had the objective of understanding the spatial distribution of hydrochemical constituents of groundwater related to its suitability for agriculture and domestic use and application of cluster analysis.
Instead of understanding, Wilde lampoons.
Puig showed signs of understanding.
Failure of understanding.
However, given that both harvest plots and standard tables were rated neutrally in terms of suitability, understanding, and intuitiveness, neither format is ideal for the display of results from overviews of reviews.
Given that the harvest plots were found to be similar to standard tables in terms of suitability and understanding, and aesthetically superior to standard tables, harvest plots are an equitable alternative for displaying the results of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews.
Further, the results are graphically represented in standard diagrams like Hill Piper (Piper 1953), US salinity (1954) and Wilcox (1955) for understanding the suitability of water for various uses.
Including temporal variations in habitat suitability of mobile species is essential for understanding a species' actual conservation status, and how well the species is protected by conservation reserves.
We also identify three methodological challenges hindering this understanding: the suitability of theoretical frameworks, the trade-offs among methods and the limited timeframe of typical research projects.
