Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
To assess the prevalence of alexithymia, the TAS-20 scores were categorized according to the suggested cut off: ≥ 61 indicating alexithymia; 51 to 60 possible alexithymia (borderline range) < 51 indicating no alexithymia.
The suggested cut off for NNFI and CFI is 0.90 or greater.
Using the manufacturer's suggested cut off value, the agreement between the two tests was fair in both the study (Ƙ = 0.34) and control (Ƙ = 0.31) groups.
To provide context, the suggested cut off for a potential PTSD diagnosis on this measure is 33 points above the minimum score.
On a single family basis, all three signals in the family are exceptionally high compared to previous studies [ 10- 19], but none of the signals meet the suggested cut off level of 3.3 for significance in GWS studies [ 36].
Using the manufacturer's suggested cut off value, we observed a concordance of 76% and a moderate agreement (Ƙ = 0.54) between the MIF and SeroCP-IgA tests (Table 2, Figure 2).
Similar(53)
Thirteen percent scored above the suggested cut-off for hyperacusis, compared to 2.5% in a psychometric study.
Moreover, the improved model shifts the suggested cut-off frequency between low- and high-frequency floors from 10 Hz to 14 Hz.
The results indicate that the concentration of endogenous GHB in urine and blood concur with the suggested cut-off levels at 1000 and 500 μg/dl, respectively.
In order to assess goodness of fit Tenenhaus et al. [83] proposes assessing R2 with a suggested cut-off value of 0.36 [84].
Results indicated that when using the NCCN suggested cut-off score of 5, the DT only identified 20 of the 36 SCL-90-R-positive cases of psychological distress (sensitivity 55.6%; specificity 80.7%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com