sufficiently with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "sufficiently with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express adequacy or sufficiency in relation to something, but it lacks clarity without additional context. Example: "The results were sufficiently with the expectations set by the team." (This example is awkward and unclear.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Tissues should be perfused sufficiently with blood and with sufficient oxygen content to ensure adequate tissue oxygen delivery.

BMC Anesthesiology

Both dealt sufficiently with identified vulnerabilities to warrant their removal.

The New York Times

They feel he doesn't connect sufficiently with the electorate: too dull, too low key.

The Guardian - Opinion

The Treasury finds that Britain has still not converged sufficiently with the euro area to allow early membership.

The Economist

Our longer-term political strategy, such as it is, appears not to be resonating sufficiently with the electorate.

Independent

Like Cartwright, he moved the ball either way, in the air or from the pitch, not extravagantly but sufficiently, with an infinite variety of subtleties.

The Guardian - Sport

First, a lot of researchers say that they feel caught out by academic interview questions that don't seem to engage sufficiently with their work.

The Guardian

His main area of concern is racing's disciplinary panel, which, he says, "has not evolved sufficiently with modern and best practice.

The Guardian - Sport

If we moved the needle sufficiently with local store marketing, I would have been prepared to say to the franchise community we'll keep doing this indefinitely.

The New York Times

The government thinks that Britain's economy may converge sufficiently with the continent's to make it feasible to join the single currency in the next parliament.

The Economist

But in their euphoria, they failed to reckon sufficiently with the resistance of entrenched bureaucracies — jealous of their authority and fearful of disorder — to change.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, consider replacing "sufficiently with" with "adequately with" or restructuring the sentence to use "sufficiently for". This often results in more grammatically sound and easily understood sentences.

Common error

A common mistake is using "with" after "sufficiently" when a different preposition or restructuring is needed. For example, instead of saying "sufficiently with resources", try "sufficiently resourceful" or "sufficiently equipped with resources".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sufficiently with" primarily functions as an adverbial modifier followed by a preposition. However, Ludwig AI points out that this construction is often grammatically questionable and may require rephrasing for clarity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

39%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "sufficiently with" appears frequently in various sources, particularly in scientific and news contexts. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. While the phrase aims to express adequacy or sufficiency, it often requires rephrasing for clarity and grammatical correctness. Alternatives such as "adequately with" or restructuring the sentence to use "sufficiently for" can improve the sentence's grammatical soundness. Despite its presence in authoritative sources like The Guardian and The New York Times, careful consideration should be given to using more precise and grammatically accepted alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adequately with

Replaces "sufficiently" with "adequately", indicating a satisfactory level but still retaining the preposition.

enough with

Uses "enough" instead of "sufficiently", suggesting the required amount or degree is present.

sufficiently for

Changes the preposition to "for", often leading to a grammatically sound construction.

sufficiently in

Modifies the preposition to "in", altering the context to indicate inclusion or involvement.

sufficiently at

Substitutes "with" for "at", often used to describe skills or abilities.

sufficiently by

Replaces "with" by "by", changing the phrase to indicate agency or means.

sufficiently through

Adjusts the preposition to "through", suggesting passage or mediation.

sufficiently under

Uses the preposition "under", modifying the phrase to imply control or influence.

sufficiently upon

Employs the preposition "upon", often used in formal contexts to mean "on".

sufficiently toward

Switches to "toward", suggesting a direction or aim.

FAQs

How can I rephrase a sentence using "sufficiently with" to be more grammatically correct?

Consider replacing "sufficiently with" with phrases like "adequately with", or restructuring the sentence to use "sufficiently for" or "sufficiently equipped with". The best choice depends on the context.

What are common prepositions that follow "sufficiently" other than 'with'?

While "sufficiently with" is not considered grammatically sound, "sufficiently" can be followed by prepositions such as "for", "in", or "at", depending on the intended meaning. For example, "sufficiently prepared for", "sufficiently skilled at".

Is "sufficiently with" ever considered correct in formal writing?

Generally, "sufficiently with" is not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. It's advisable to use alternative phrasing for clarity and adherence to standard English grammar.

What is the difference between "sufficiently with" and "sufficiently for"?

"Sufficiently with" is typically considered grammatically incorrect, while "sufficiently for" is a valid construction indicating that something is adequate or enough for a particular purpose or requirement.