Sentence examples for sufficiently characterised from inspiring English sources

One author anonymously gave his impressions of Ventenat's discovery in an 1800 publication: This beautiful species, which is sufficiently characterised to distinguish it from every other individual of the class, is copiously produced in Dutch Guiana, about 300 paces from the sea, and nearly as far from the left bank of the river of Surinam.

With the possible exception of acetylation, which has not been sufficiently characterised, PCNA modifications are all associated with DNA-bound PCNA.

Beyond standard SES measures, a person's financial situation, particularly in older ages, is also worth considering as a unique economic determinant of healthful eating since everyday financial troubles are not sufficiently characterised by conventional SES indicators (Sullivan, Turner, & Danziger, 2008).

Many biological markers appear to be sufficiently characterised for the study of progressive osteoarthritis, but few have been identified for the diagnosis of the early stage of the disease.

Additionally, we showed that the average contact angles and the contact angles measured outside porous media cannot sufficiently characterise the wettability in pore-network models.

Overall, in many cases, the investigated nanomaterials as produced as well as in media are neither sufficiently described nor characterised.

We discuss why stress tensor variability can be sufficiently and appropriately characterised by its distinct tensor components in a multivariate manner, and demonstrate that the proposed statistical model gives consistent results under coordinate system transformation.

The title is "sufficiently liquid to characterise the confusion of our times", according to the blurb on Amazon.

The sensitivity of the test method is sufficiently high to characterise between coatings produced under different conditions, but the interpretation of the results is not always straightforward.

After being brought in front of the ICJ by the Australian and New Zealand governments, it was argued that Japan's "scientific" whaling programme was merely commercial whaling in disguise The ICJ ruled that while JARPA II could broadly be characterised as "scientific research", Japan had not sufficiently justified the whaling quotas it had set, and that they should cease the programme immediately.

"We think that the information contained in the report was sufficiently important that the deliberate failure to provide it could properly be characterised as a 'cover-up'," consultants from Grant Thornton have concluded.