"sufficient thinking" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe a thought process that has been done extensively and adequately. For example: "All employees must engage in sufficient thinking before making a decision - this means considering the impact of the decision from multiple angles."
If we can offer them sufficient thinking time in which to turn around their behaviour, they often will, especially if they feel part of the solution rather than the problem.
Only start bothering someone after sufficient thinking time by yourself.
The placement of new systems of containment on existing bridge's boards requires a detailed analysis and a sufficient thinking to design and execute an adequate solution that, based on our experience in pathology's studies, is not achieved in many cases.
Young people described limited levels of physical and mental energy as a key barrier that could make it difficult for young people to take part in the survey and to spend sufficient time thinking through their answers.
But as Paul points out, before I form an intention I typically lack sufficient reason for thinking that I will perform the action intended if I have sufficient reason to believe that I will F, then I needn't form the intention to F at all.
But is systems thinking sufficient?
However, it has been questioned whether Russell had sufficient argumentation for thinking that there are such simple beings.
The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it.
"The technology today is sufficient to begin thinking about these things," said Pete Worden, Breakthrough Starshot's executive director and the former head of NASA's Ames Research Center.
And then regularly set aside sufficient strategic thinking time to consider how you are doing relative to your strategic map.
Since the animalist does not accept that we are identical to any of these non-animals, the evident truth of (P1) will not be sufficient to establish the thinking animal argument's conclusion.
