Exact(3)
For the issues to be discussed below it will suffice to consider cases where the indicated fact that is p in the formulation of [IC] is of the form s′ : T ′, as in the radar example.
However, since the channel is assumed to be Markov, it will suffice to consider the set of current channel gains over all users and subcarriers, denoted by H t = {Hk,n,t,∀k,n}, and the set of contributions as of time t − 1 toward the average rate of all users in the current time window, denoted by St−1= {Sk,∀k1,∀k}.
By symmetry, it will suffice to consider one of the remaining two triples in (6).
Similar(5)
It suffices to consider the case (w=1).
It suffices to consider only the case.
It suffices to consider the case.
So it suffices to consider IBVP (2.1).
Thus it suffices to consider (C3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com