successive with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "successive with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear in what context it is intended to be used, as "successive" typically describes a sequence or order, while "with" does not fit well in this construction. Example: "The events occurred in successive order, but the phrase 'successive with' does not apply here."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Conversely, in the west and southwest, the section is successive with thicknesses of about 7000 8000 m (Zappaterra 1994; Velaj 2012).

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

A nucleotide sequence encoding the histone-derived substrate sequence were added to the 5' end of mCitrine through two rounds of successive with the primers: '1-XbaI-H3K27-SEQ' and 'YFP-BK-CPL'; and '2-XbaI-H3K27-SEQ' '2-XbaI-H3K27-SEQ' '2-XbaI-H3K27-SEQ' '2-XbaI-H3K27-SEQ'ith Xbandand HindIII enzymes and ligated with the previously mentioned XbaI and HindIII digested plasmid.

BMC Biotechnology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The network would go through this process successive times with each image, refining its elephant-seeking algorithm with each new pass.

TechCrunch

After successive washings with ultrafiltered (0.02 µm) water, the surface was dried with pressurised Ar.

Plosone

Avoid the dizzying effect of beginning successive sentences with "but".

The New York Times

Dance themes are iterated by successive performers with different inflections.

The New York Times - Arts

Another study is of the effect of successive infection with different diseases.

The Guardian

$6$Wadede Boggs's seven successive seasons with 200 or more hits.

The New York Times - Sports

They shared custody of their son, who spent successive weeks with each of them.

The New Yorker

Starting two successive sentences with "but" creates a head-spinning effect that we should avoid.

The New York Times

Amendments require a two-thirds vote in two successive legislatures, with an election intervening.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "successive with" in your writing. Instead, rephrase to use "successive" as an adjective followed by a noun, or use "successively" as an adverb. For example, use "successive attempts" or describe actions performed "successively".

Common error

Do not assume that "successive with" is a standard construction. It is not recognized as grammatically correct. Always check your grammar and consider alternatives that provide clarity and accuracy, such as 'in succession' or 'successively'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "successive with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. While "successive" functions as an adjective to describe a series, the addition of "with" does not create a coherent or standard English construction. Ludwig AI highlights the incorrect nature of the phrase.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "successive with" is generally grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase lacks proper grammatical structure. Although some examples exist in sources like news articles and scientific publications, it's better to use alternatives such as "in succession" or rephrase the sentence using "successively" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. Always aim for precise and standard English constructions to avoid confusion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subsequent with

Replaces "successive" with "subsequent", implying a following occurrence, but the grammatical issue with 'with' persists.

consecutive with

Substitutes "successive" with "consecutive", indicating an unbroken sequence, but the core grammatical problem related to 'with' remains.

succession with

Transforms "successive" into a noun, altering the grammatical structure but retaining some semantic similarity. Still grammatically suspect.

various with

This replacement changes the meaning, focusing on variety rather than sequence; not directly interchangeable.

previous with

Changes the meaning to refer to something that came before, instead of something following in a sequence.

uninterrupted with

This phrase focuses on continuity, which is different from sequential occurrence implied by "successive".

continuous with

Similar to "uninterrupted with", this emphasizes ongoing nature, not necessarily a series of events.

frequent with

Indicates high occurrence but doesn't convey the sequential aspect of "successive".

next with

Indicates the following item, but lacks the implication of a series or sequence conveyed by "successive".

consequent with

Indicates something that follows as a result, rather than in a direct sequence.

FAQs

How can I use "successive" correctly in a sentence?

Use "successive" as an adjective to describe a series of things, like "successive attempts" or "successive years". Avoid using "successive with", as it's not grammatically correct.

What are some alternatives to "successive with"?

Consider alternatives like "in "in succession"" or using the adverb "successively" to express the idea of things following one after another.

Is "successive with" grammatically correct?

No, "successive with" is not grammatically correct. Ludwig AI identifies this as an incorrect usage. It's better to rephrase your sentence for clarity and correctness.

What is the difference between "successive" and "successively"?

"Successive" is an adjective used to describe a series of things, while "successively" is an adverb used to describe how something is done. For example, "successive failures" (adjective) versus "events happening "events happening successively"" (adverb).