Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
No statistically significant differences were found between groups at baseline in terms of overall success mean ratings, successful ventilation, LMA handling mean ratings and time to successful ventilation (Table 4).
This study was designed to compare the performances of 4 airway devices in achieving successful ventilation.
Two early successful ventilation systems were installed in 1899 in Cornell's dissecting rooms (for the cadavers) and 1903, at the New York Stock Exchange (for the stockbrokers).
Eighty-three (66%) achieved successful ventilation.
One year after training, time for successful ventilation for all devices was lower than 25 seconds.
Correct tube position, and subsequently successful ventilation was assessed with capnography and bilateral chest auscultation.
Similar(35)
The number of successful ventilations in the first trial did not significantly differ between the W and C groups (p=0.51).
To investigate whether gender difference has an effect on an anesthesia resident's ability to perform successful mask ventilation.
Nevertheless, an example of successful bellows ventilation has been reported by Fell in 1891 in a clinical trial [ 1]. James Leroy d'Etiolles emphasized the need for early use of the bellows and recommended in 1828 a graduated bellows according to the patient size to reduce hyperventilation with high volumes which may induce barotrauma [ 1].
After successful resuscitation, ventilation was increased to 70 breaths per minute, with inspiratory pressures of 18 20 mmH2O, and the rats received 50 mg/kg BW ampicillin (Clamoxyl, GlaxoSmithKline, Switzerland) for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and 20 μg/kg BW buprenorphine (Temgesic, Reckitt Benckiser, Switzerland) as pain relieve intramuscularly.
In case of non-successful mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation is not possible or problematic a laryngeal mask should be considered as a good alternative.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com