Suggestions(1)
Exact(9)
Sterilized substrates, treated with acid and enzyme were inoculated with 105 106 cells/mL separately.
Figure 14B shows the Raman spectra obtained from SERS substrates treated with E. coli or S. aureus.
The firm adhesion events at a wall shear stress of 0.2 Pa occurred rarely for the substrates treated with nothing or with 1% BSA only compared to the number of events that occurred on substrates coated with 1% BSA supplemented with 0.1, 1, or 10 μg/mL P-selectin (Fig. 1), indicating that cell adhesion was specific for P-selectin.
Adult midges were exposed to different substrates treated with 'dry' conidia and conidia suspended in 0.03% aq.
Various substrates were tried out during our study: freshly cleaved mica, glass, silica, polystyrene, agarose, special etched grid substrates with micrometer pitch matching typical H. walsbyi cell size and substrates treated with poly-lysine were all tested [14], [15], [16], [17].
For all substrates treated with 0.25% NaOH, EX3 was required only at the lowest proportion (4%-54%-5
Similar(51)
(c) Silica substrate treated with alkylsilane.
As shown in Fig. S1a and b, the substrate treated with oxygen plasma has lower contact angle values than that of the non-treated substrate.
The concentration of xylose was reported 23.3 g/L when substrate treated with acid H2SO4 which showed relatively low amount of xylose after acid and enzymatic hydrolysis [28].
B Raman spectra obtained from bare SERS chips, prepared without 4-MPBA, and in contact with E. coli (I) or S. aureus (II), obtained from a SERS substrate treated with 4-MPBA and in contact with E. coli (III) and S. aureus (IV), or a 4-MPBA treated SERS substrate in the absence of bacteria (V).
In this work, atomic force microscopy (AFM), which is a relatively less diffused technique, is applied to illustrate and estimate changes of the surface roughness of a clinker substrate, treated with different electrolytic solutions, with and without superplasticizer, at different times of hydration.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com