The phrase "substitution problem" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used when discussing mathematical or computer science problems. For example: "I'm trying to solve this algebra substitution problem but I'm not sure which equation to use."
In effect, Problem 1 merely brings out the force of the Easy Arguments for mind-independence and abstractness, which are discussed in Section 7. Problem 2. Does the Russellian theory avoid the Substitution Problem and the Objectivization Effect?
Friederike Moltmann (2003) dubs this problem the Substitution Problem.
and (2) Does it really avoid the Substitution Problem and the Objectivization Effect?
One solvent substitution problem was studied, and the results showed good agreement with experiments.
Closely related to the Substitution Problem is what Moltmann (2003, p. 87) calls the Objectivization Effect, or objectivization.
Such securities cannot be replicated by conventional hedging strategies, and they also mitigate the asset substitution problem.
Moreover, under the substitution (3), problem (2) is transformed into the following non-degenerate problem: L u = ( − 1 ) m t a ( y ) u ( 2 m ) ( y ) + A λ ( y ) u ( y ) + ∑ k = 0 2 m − 1 t k 2 m A k ( y ) u ( k ) ( y ) = f ( y ), (4).
Due to the low density, corrosion resistance and convenient specific stiffness aluminum, magnesium, and titanium alloys were considered as substitutes for steel substitution in the problem.
Moreover, under the substitution (3.7) the problem (3.1 - 3.2 3.1 - 3.2to the nondegenereducesP (3.9).
Boolos (1985) noted that the Rule of Substitution causes a problem of this kind for Frege's program given that it is equivalent the Comprehension Principle for Concepts.
It is not clear that this view will be immune to substitution and objectivization problems.
