Sentence examples for substitute evidence from inspiring English sources
The phrase "substitute evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the replacement or alternative forms of evidence in a particular context, such as legal, academic, or research settings. Example: "In the absence of direct evidence, we may need to rely on substitute evidence to support our claims."
The lack of such evidence brings with it a number of risks including a tendency to substitute evidence with a focus on political ideology, economic priorities and political party machinations (Ishimine et al., 2009).
A society where ideology is a substitute for evidence can go badly awry.
But if we are to make informed decisions on health and technology, misplaced fear of the unknown or dogmatic convictions are simply no substitute for evidence and understanding.
It's apparently a very old idea going back thousands of years, and we know that in pseudoscience circles age is a perfectly valid substitute for "evidence that is actually works".
The court stated that "speculation cannot substitute for evidence that the use of the drug is 'sure or very likely to cause serious illness and needless suffering,'" citing the decision in Baze v. Rees.
However, these studies are inherently prone to selection bias and cannot substitute prospective evidence.
The weirdly narcissistic statements he made about it on YouTube are, for the moment, a substitute for evidence of any kind to back up his claim. .
Professional opinion, however, is no substitute for evidence.
Such an indirect treatment comparison has to be regarded as a complementary assessment to clinical trials, because it cannot substitute direct evidence.
No form of post-adoption surveillance can substitute the evidence deriving from RCTs, but using post adoption surveillance combined with risk sharking tools for all technologies that lack long term effectiveness and safety data and for which costs of usage are higher than monitoring costs, is likely to improve the efficiency of health resources.
Politics, by contrast, is deeply entangled with ideology – it is not bound to respect reality as science is, and thinks nothing of substituting convincing evidence for emotive rhetoric.
