Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
Microsoft, which is appealing, has argued that Judge Jackson committed substantive errors in the antitrust case.
Microsoft has accused the judge of being biased and of committing substantive errors in the government's antitrust lawsuit.
In its opening brief with the Court of Appeals, the company accused Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson of committing a host of procedural and substantive errors.
Microsoft has countered that Judge Jackson committed a raft of procedural and substantive errors and that he was biased against it.
A27 BUSINESS DAY C1-22 Microsoftoldtitrust appeal Microsofederal appealsal appeals court that Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson had committed a host of procedural and substantive errors and that his antitrust finding and remedies should be overruled.
Firing the opening salvo in its appeal of a landmark antitrust case, the Microsoft Corporation said today that the trial judge who ordered its breakup had committed a host of procedural and substantive errors.
Similar(47)
"If somebody comes to us and says that, in our review, there has been a factual and substantive error, we'll go back and take a look at that".
The order signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the Federal District Court in Manhattan says the two sides "agree that there was a substantive error in the judgment" and that they "voluntarily have resolved all issues between them".
In doing so, Microsoft declared that the judge "committed an array of serious and substantive procedural errors".
In a legal document filed yesterday, Microsoft argued that the government's antitrust case is "completely unsuitable for direct appeal" to the Supreme Court because it is complex and because the trial judge made "serious and substantive procedural errors".
Paul Krugman, writes Donald Luskin of Palo Alto, Calif., has committed "dozens of substantive factual errors, distortions, misquotations and false quotations -- all pronounced in a voice of authoritativeness that most columnists would not presume to permit themselves".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com