Sentence examples for substantive claims from inspiring English sources
The phrase "substantive claims" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, academic, or formal contexts to refer to claims that have a significant basis or merit, as opposed to procedural or technical claims. Example: "The court will only consider substantive claims that demonstrate a violation of rights."
I believe that these tactics are not really about making substantive claims, but rather play the role of silencing.
But it has become apparent that very few substantive claims (even in mathematics) can be established by valid arguments from totally obvious premises.
Now, of course the Times Opinion section as a whole can provide daily models of "logical arguments based on substantive claims," whether through the Editorial page, Op-Ed columnists, Letters to the Editor or even the collection of Opinion videos.
In fact, it is the very people detained for lengthy periods like Rodriguez who are most likely to win their cases and be allowed to remain in the US because they have substantive claims to make.
"This case is far from over, for a lot of reasons, and I am going to wait until we are done before I comment on any of the substantive claims of this case," he said.
Here's how the overview in the Standards document summarizes it: The ability to write logical arguments based on substantive claims, sound reasoning and relevant evidence is a cornerstone of the writing standards, with opinion writing — a basic form of argument — extending down into the earliest grades.
A more substantive claim against them may be that they approved Fastow's partnership deals so that they could deceive investors and cover up Enron's disastrous course.
And some of their arguments — for instance, "party nominations and the presidency itself usually are won by the candidate with the most impressive substantive claim on the job" — are contradicted by their own analysis of recent events.
This substitution, unfortunately, led to countless (and continuing) debates about whether the thesis of natural selection is a substantive claim about the real world or simply a tautology (a statement, such as "All bachelors are unmarried," that is true by virtue of its form or the meaning of its terms).
While making irrelevant remarks about the sanitary conditions in the courtroom, your editorial did not explain what substantive claim it had against the verdict, which, incidentally, can still be overturned on appeal and was reached after months of deliberations and testimony with all guarantees for the defendant to present his defense.
Rather, this is a substantive claim that needs both refinement and defense.
