Sentence examples for substantially smaller size from inspiring English sources

Discussions of these issues are presented separately for the current operating fleet, for new reactor designs similar in size to the current fleet, and for prospective new reactors of substantially smaller size.

Discordant genes were equally abundant in subject domains and boundary regions, despite the substantially smaller size of the boundary regions.

H2126 cell line, which is known to have homozygous deletion of exons 4 6, expressed mRNA with substantially smaller size (∼1000 bp) corresponding to deletion of 398 bp.

Conserv aggregate has a substantially smaller particle size than Lithomex and this was evaluated again using a stereo microscope.

There is a mutation in humans that partially reduces the expression of one of the Ragulator components, and patients carrying this mutation are substantially smaller in size than their peers, a characteristic of mTORC1 pathway inhibition in model organisms (1, 2, 7).

By contrast, intact normal cell nuclei are likely to be contained in such a section, since these are substantially smaller in size.

Because the 'Meat and alcohol' cluster had a substantially smaller sample size than the other clusters, however, these findings may not be highly meaningful.

Even though the effect sizes showed slightly larger differences in magnitude compared to the less than 80 group they were highly imprecise due to substantially smaller sample size, hence they have not been reported here.

The results may not be broadly applicable to the full spectrum of patients with schizophrenia due to the specific recruitment criteria for the study, and substantially smaller sample size for the underweight group.

Perhaps the most revealing one was the LTR/Gypsy class: although these repeat elements are the least impacted in the nrpe mutant (Fig. 3A), the 22 LTR/Gypsy elements demonstrating RNAP V-dependent small RNA suppression of 1,322 small RNA-producing LTR/Gypsy elements are substantially smaller in size (Fig. 4B).

This latter finding contrasts somewhat with the significant albeit small (r = 0.18) sibling cross-correlations for ADHD and ASD reported by Mulligan et al. yet may be explained by the substantially smaller sample size and use of a qualitatively different questionnaire in the Nijmeijer et al. study.