Sentence examples for substantially more benefit from inspiring English sources

Whether a drug treats people of a particular age, gender or ethnicity, it must provide substantially more benefit than risk.

Note that the filtered set of B>M probes provided substantially more benefit for Method II than for Method I. Consequently, rigorous filtering of probes is more critical when using a single hybridization (Method II) than when data from multiple hybridizations (Method I) are available.

The current study had been designed to test the hypothesis that breast cancers with HRD would derive substantially more benefit from intensified DNA DSB-inducing agents than tumors without HRD.

A ban is estimated not to provide substantially more benefit for this outcome than a limit of 0.02 mg/m, whereas a smaller impact was estimated for a limit of 0.03 mg/m.

Both the Brookings-Urban the Policy Center and the more conservative Tax Foundation concluded that the Trump tax cut would result in massively higher deficits, with the wealthy getting substantially more benefits.

Therefore, subgroup analysis is often used in an attempt to identify specific groups of patients who may receive substantially more or less benefit compared to the average effect of the study intervention[ 15].

Of course all European countries offer substantially more generous social benefits to their citizens than does the United States -- including universal health care.

Prophylactic use of surfactant is more effective than administration after RDS symptoms develop, but it is substantially more costly and benefits are limited to very preterm newborns (<30 weeks gestation) [ 340].

Specifically, the reproductive output of domatia-bearing, perennial plants benefited substantially more from ant protection than that of annual, non-domatia-bearing plants (Tukey's HSD, P = 0.026), but the effect for perennial plants that did not produce domatia was not significantly different from either of the other groups (Fig. 3).

"It doesn't really have much benefit, but does substantially more harm," said Dr. Steven Woloshin, one of the co-authors of the journal article and a professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.

They should also acknowledge the extent to which, under any of these frameworks, they themselves want government to provide "free stuff" -- and generally in a way that benefits the rich substantially more than those who actually need the help.