Sentence examples for substantially lower number from inspiring English sources

This species difference is probably related to anatomical differences including a substantially lower number of airway branching in the mouse compared to the human lung that may result in a faster spillover of damaging factors from the conducting airways to the distal airspaces in mice.

Even though women make up more than 50percentt of the workforce and earn 60percentt of undergraduate and graduate degrees, they still hold a substantially lower number of executive-level positions across job sectors.

In contrast, species criteria that place greater emphases on more explicit properties of species (e.g. reproductive isolation or gene tree monophyly) would yield a substantially lower number of delimited and recognized species.

Alternatively, bovine SA may not undergo change as rapidly as human-associated SA isolates; the substantially lower number of genes associated with antibiotic resistance in the genome of strain ET3-1 provides additional evidence for a slower rate of genetic exchange.

In our case, the GWAS approach also identified a substantially lower number of associations than LDLA.

Second, strict inclusion criteria and a substantially lower number of male subjects in bariatric clinic cohorts hindered enrollment of men with IGM in this study.

Asked to describe the direction the study would push the arsenal, Mr. Rumsfeld said, "There is no doubt in my mind that we'll be able to go down to substantially lower numbers".

It should be noted that tumors with high metastatic efficiency, such as melanoma [ 63] or non-small cell lung cancer [ 64] will have substantially lower numbers of CTC.

It also found that few programs are preparing prospective teachers for the Common Core State Standards, and that 75percentt of programs aren't teaching teachers specific methods of instruction "that could substantially lower the number of children who never become proficient readers".

Thus, although the literature shows that the inclusion of the "Don't know" option may substantially lower the number of respondents offering their opinions [ 25], in our case it would seem to have made little difference to our overall interpretation.

Numbers of validated cases available for prospective analyses, considering only new cases after the C8HP (or after 1 August 2006 for workers not in the C8HP), were substantially lower than numbers available for retrospective analyses (Table 1).