Sentence examples for substantially higher detection from inspiring English sources

Substantially higher detection rates for colorectal cancer and for advanced adenomas correspond with increasing numbers needed to be scoped.

Among the laboratory methods we used for bacterial testing, real-time PCR had a substantially higher detection rate than other assays.

These advantages of AFI were limited to less-experienced endoscopists because experienced endoscopists exhibited a substantially high detection rate for colorectal adenoma with HRE.

Therefore, in the final multivariate model, the multibacillary form was substantially associated with higher detection rates.

We found that currently active agricultural workers had substantially higher frequencies of detection of agricultural herbicides in their homes than did former agricultural workers and nonfarmers.

Whereas other studies comparing pooled NAAT to earlier-generation tests (with longer window periods) have shown similar or higher results, our 11.5% increase in detection yield was substantially higher than other studies comparing pooled NAAT to third-generation EIA.

HPV DNA detection in this study had substantially higher sensitivity (93.0% versus 75.0%) and lower specificity (86.0% versus 88.0%) in comparison to the detection of p16 when samples positive for viral mRNA were considered positive (data not shown).

The hazard ratio vs the general population is 1.08 (95%, confidence interval 0.89 1.36), whereas the risk of death after detection of tumour recurrence is substantially higher (Table 2).

In the subsequent round of testing, the adjusted colposcopy referral rate was substantially higher, at 544.7/1000 (95%CI; 494.5, 594.9) and the CIN2+ detection rate in the subsequent round was also substantially increased at 244.1/1000 (95%CI; 168.8, 319.4) and 110.2/1000 (95%CI; 55.3, 165.1) for CIN3+.

On both cow and badger faeces DNA, recovery was poor (<1%) irrespective of method: detection either failed or the analytical sensitivities were substantially higher than for soils (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Interestingly, the control group of GPs who reported detection of new cases at follow up was substantially higher compared with the intervention group of GPs, despite not participating in the training program.