Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

substantially corresponded with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantially corresponded with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the degree to which two things align or match in a significant way. Example: "The findings of the study substantially corresponded with previous research, indicating a consistent trend in the data."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Technological change is, on average, negative, and the value substantially corresponds to the TFPC.

While Mr. Kerry's selection of Mr. Edwards did not substantially alter the race, it corresponded with a deepening of the support for Mr. Kerry, though that support remained less intense than that for Mr. Bush.

News & Media

The New York Times

They have detected significantly higher amounts of suberin, i.e., 34 times greater in the endodermis and six times greater in the exodermis, in the apoplastic barriers of rice corresponded with a substantially lower root hydraulic conductivity compared with maize.

Science

Rice

Inducing alginate lyase expression substantially decreased the amount of alginate produced, which corresponded with a significant increase in the number of detached cells.

Corresponded with: Robert D. Howard.

Corresponded with: J. Fullerton Brown.

Corresponded with: Seymour N. Fox.

Still, Rule corresponded with him.

He corresponded with the serial killer Ted Bundy.

Finlay corresponded with Hitler's architect, Albert Speer.

Corresponded with: George Nebolsine, and others.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "substantially corresponded with" when you want to emphasize a strong, but not perfect, agreement or alignment between two things. Ensure that the context implies a meaningful connection, not just a superficial similarity.

Common error

Avoid using "substantially corresponded with" if the relationship is weak or coincidental. The "substantially" implies a significant degree of alignment; if this isn't accurate, opt for a weaker term like "related to" or "associated with".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantially corresponded with" functions as a relational phrase, indicating a significant degree of agreement, alignment, or correlation between two or more elements. As Ludwig AI suggests, it implies a strong, but not necessarily perfect, correspondence.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "substantially corresponded with" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe a strong alignment or agreement between two or more things, without implying a perfect match. Ludwig AI confirms the appropriateness of the phrase. While its usage isn't frequent, it finds relevance in contexts such as science, news, and formal communication. Related phrases include "closely aligned with" or "largely coincided with". When using this phrase, be sure the degree of alignment truly is significant. In conclusion, while accurate, remember that "substantially corresponded with" carries a degree of formality that isn't appropriate for all situations.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "substantially corresponded with" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "closely aligned with", "significantly correlated with", or "largely coincided with". These alternatives maintain the meaning while elevating the register.

Is "substantially corresponded with" interchangeable with "exactly matched"?

No, "substantially corresponded with" implies a strong but not perfect agreement. "Exactly matched" suggests a complete and total equivalence. Use "substantially corresponded with" when there are minor differences or nuances.

When is it appropriate to use "substantially corresponded with" in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, use "substantially corresponded with" to describe results or findings that closely align with existing theories or prior research. It acknowledges a strong agreement without claiming perfect replication or identity.

Are there contexts where "substantially corresponded with" is not appropriate?

Avoid using "substantially corresponded with" in informal conversation or when describing trivial similarities. The phrase's formality and emphasis on significant alignment make it unsuitable for casual or unimportant contexts.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: