substantial with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe a significant or considerable relationship or connection with something, but it lacks clarity and proper usage. Example: "The project was substantial with its impact on the community." (This example is awkward and unclear.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It will be substantial, with about 120 seats.

The New York Times - Food

Everyone appreciates that I've done something substantial with my time".

The New York Times

The wine list is substantial, with bottles $25 to $350 and glasses $7 to $14.

The New York Times

The margin of victory was substantial, with Rees winning 68,750 votes to Ferguson's 39,577.

The Guardian

It is rich and substantial, with oil-burning lamps, lushly woven carpets and tall wooden cabinets.

The New York Times - Travel

It rises, then falls when something more substantial with youth appeal comes along.

The New York Times - Arts

Strange player, McGeady, who clearly has the talent but rarely delivers anything substantial with it.

The Guardian - Sport

The farms in Ralph Carpentier's paintings look more substantial, with occasional humans and animals to indicate active use.

The New York Times

But it's substantial, with the north-east's biggest city, Maiduguri, likely to be the next major target.

The Guardian

Some of the NHS contracts on offer are enticingly substantial, with the prospect of £100m-a-year-plus of revenues.

The Guardian

Marc Br?f, $19, ** 1/2 Vouvray 2008 Mellow and substantial with bright citrus and mineral flavors.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "substantial with" in formal writing. Instead, opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "substantial in", "significant regarding", or rephrase your sentence for clarity and precision.

Common error

Many writers incorrectly use "substantial with" to directly link a subject with a characteristic. For example, instead of saying "The project was substantial with its impact", rephrase to "The project's impact was substantial" or "The project was significant in its impact."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial with" functions as an adjectival modifier attempting to connect a quality (substantial) with a related aspect. As Ludwig AI highlights, this construction is often grammatically awkward and lacks clarity. Examples in Ludwig demonstrate its use across various domains, though alternative phrasings often provide better precision.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

39%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Academia

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "substantial with" appears frequently across various sources, but Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. While its intent is to link a significant quality with another aspect, better alternatives exist, such as "significant in" or rewriting for clarity. Its usage spans news, science, and business, but it's best to avoid "substantial with" in formal writing for greater precision. Though its usage is widespread, grammatical alternatives ensure clearer communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

considerable in

Replaces "substantial" with "considerable" and restructures the sentence to use "in" instead of "with".

significant regarding

Substitutes "substantial" with "significant" and changes the preposition to "regarding", implying a notable impact or relevance.

material to

Uses "material" in place of "substantial" and "to" instead of "with" focusing on the relevance or importance of something.

meaningful for

Replaces "substantial" with "meaningful" and uses "for" instead of "with", highlighting the value or importance to a particular context.

notable in relation to

Substitutes "substantial" with "notable" and restructures the phrase to "in relation to", emphasizing a connection or comparison.

marked by

This option moves the focus from magnitude to characteristics, using "marked by" instead of "substantial with."

abundant in

Replaces "substantial" with "abundant" and uses "in" instead of "with" focusing on plentiful amounts or presence.

rich in

Substitutes "substantial" with "rich" focusing on the presence of desirable qualities.

copious in

Uses "copious" in place of "substantial," and changes the preposition to "in," to indicate a large quantity or amount.

considerably

This alternative simplifies the phrase, focusing on the adverbial form to indicate the degree or extent of something.

FAQs

Is "substantial with" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "substantial with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. While it appears in some contexts, it's better to use alternatives like "significant in" or rephrase your sentence for better clarity.

What are some alternatives to "substantial with"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "considerable in", "significant regarding", or simply reword the sentence to use "substantial" as an adjective modifying a noun.

How can I use the word "substantial" correctly in a sentence?

Use "substantial" as an adjective to describe something significant, considerable, or large. For example, "The company made a substantial profit this year."

What's the difference between saying "substantial with" vs "significant in"?

"Substantial with" is grammatically awkward and often unclear. "Significant in" is a more standard and accepted way to convey that something is important or has a notable impact in a particular area. Use "significant in" to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness.