Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
substantial personnel changes
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "substantial personnel changes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing significant modifications or alterations in the staff or workforce of an organization. Example: "The company announced substantial personnel changes in response to the recent restructuring efforts."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Academia
Alternative expressions(13)
no substantial changes
substantial changes
substantial personnel
changes of personnel
any substantial changes
this leads to substantial changes
because of personnel changes
is undergoing substantial changes
any substantial changes in
there are no substantial changes
undergo substantial changes
due to personnel changes
due to substantial changes
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
The musicians -- players from Lincoln Center ensembles and outsiders -- were concerned that a new music director might make substantial personnel changes.
News & Media
That summer, the team also made substantial personnel changes, trading long-time players Patrick Lalime and Radek Bonk, and signing free agent goaltender Dominik Hasek.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
Significant elite personnel changes have also been under way.
News & Media
Belgium also made two personnel changes but also a substantial change to its tactics and formation.
News & Media
Personnel changes.
News & Media
Some blame personnel changes.
News & Media
Analysis of the personnel changes.
News & Media
(4 Shift or personnel changes.
Academia
Greenhill also announced some personnel changes.
News & Media
Personnel changes are not a bad thing.
News & Media
Big personnel changes are likely.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing organizational changes, use "substantial personnel changes" to clearly convey significant modifications in staffing. Ensure the context supports the scale and impact implied by "substantial".
Common error
Avoid using "substantial personnel changes" if the modifications are minor or do not significantly affect the organization's overall structure or operations. Ensure the term accurately reflects the magnitude of the changes.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "substantial personnel changes" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it correctly describes notable modifications in staffing.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Wiki
25%
Academia
8%
Less common in
Science
8%
Encyclopedias
1%
Formal & Business
0.01%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "substantial personnel changes" is a noun phrase used to describe significant modifications in an organization's workforce. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and can be used in written English. It is most commonly found in news and media contexts, indicating its role in reporting organizational shifts. While "substantial personnel changes" carries a neutral register, it is important to use it accurately, ensuring the changes are indeed considerable. Alternatives like "significant staff restructuring" or "major workforce reshuffle" can be used depending on the specific nuance intended.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
significant staff restructuring
Emphasizes the reorganization aspect of the staff changes.
sweeping personnel overhaul
Suggests a complete and extensive change in personnel.
large-scale staff alterations
Highlights that the staff changes are broad and impactful.
major workforce reshuffle
Highlights a large-scale reorganization of employees.
marked alterations in staffing
Emphasizes the noticeable nature of the staffing changes.
considerable staffing adjustments
Indicates adjustments made to the staffing levels.
noticeable employee restructuring
Focuses on the restructuring effect of the employee changes and how it's easily perceived.
comprehensive manpower changes
Describes changes affecting the entire workforce.
extensive employee turnover
Focuses on the rate at which employees are replaced.
radical team modifications
Implies extreme or fundamental changes within teams.
FAQs
What does "substantial personnel changes" mean?
The phrase "substantial personnel changes" refers to significant modifications or alterations in the staff or workforce of an organization, typically implying a major impact on operations or structure.
How can I use "substantial personnel changes" in a sentence?
You might say, "The company announced "substantial personnel changes" in response to the recent restructuring efforts" or ""Substantial personnel changes" are expected following the merger".
What are some alternatives to "substantial personnel changes"?
You can use alternatives like "significant staff restructuring", "major workforce reshuffle", or "extensive employee turnover" depending on the specific context.
When is it appropriate to use the term "substantial personnel changes"?
Use this phrase when the changes in staffing are considerable and have a noticeable impact on the organization's functioning, strategy, or culture. Avoid using it for minor adjustments or routine reassignments.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested