Sentence examples for substantial omissions from inspiring English sources
The phrase "substantial omissions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to significant gaps or missing information in a document, report, or discussion. Example: "The report was criticized for its substantial omissions, which led to misunderstandings about the project's progress."
This is from Cathy Mann, director of corporate affairs at Halliburton: As we continue to review BP's internal report published earlier today, we have noticed a number of substantial omissions and inaccuracies in the document.
Studies of the blowout preventer's two control pods suggest that a flattish battery and a dodgy valve meant that neither was in a fit state to close off the well automatically when they should have, which BP takes as evidence of poor maintenance by Transocean.Halliburton quickly pointed to "substantial omissions and inaccuracies" in the report.
Despite its readability and a plethora of scholarly references, however, there are substantial omissions and misrepresentations.
It is a substantial omission, even if the Rangers have had no official comment on Boogaard's death.
It described Mr. Koch as "the master showman of City Hall, who parlayed shrewd political instincts and plenty of chutzpah into three tumultuous terms as New York's mayor with all the tenacity, zest and combativeness that personified his city of golden dreams …" But later that morning, obituary editors heard from a Times reporter that there was a substantial omission.
The purpose of this paper is to underline what we consider to be substantial omission or error.
This is a significant omission.
To the extent that this omission is substantial, the medical benefits to lead hazard control are underestimated.
The omission of substantial numbers of childless emigrants from our data results in an overestimation of the fertility of the immigrant population in Sweden.
In addition, propensity score matching algorithms have limited generalizability attributable to omission of substantial unmatched portions of the population; however, this is not the case with inverse probability weighting.
Thus, while interference with eating and exercise might be part of the burden of insulin therapy, interference with other aspects of daily living had a more substantial association with insulin omission.
