substantial infringement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial infringement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to describe a significant violation of rights, such as copyright or patent infringement. Example: "The court found that the company had committed substantial infringement on the patent held by the plaintiff."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

The argument then becomes how you tell whether a cyberlocker is being used for substantial infringement.

The Guardian

As altered, the bill now allows for ISPs to be required to block access to sites that allow "substantial" infringement.

The Guardian

Jan Witold Baran, a leading Republican election lawyer, told the Supreme Court today that any limits on how much direct help political parties could give candidates for federal office amounted to a "clear, direct and substantial infringement" of the parties' right of free speech.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

These companies argue that a decision for LGE could allow many "new, and very substantial, abusive patent infringement claims" against anyone who sells or uses a patented device.

Cornell University

It contains no protections for substantial non-infringing uses, meaning a manufacturer of an MP3 player could be liable for copyright infringement by a single user, even if 3 million other users committed no infringement at all.

Forbes

The SEC has formidable investigatory powers and can levy substantial fines for infringements of its rules.

The Economist

If BN raises a substantial question concerning either infringement or validity, i.e., asserts an infringement or invalidity defense that the patentee cannot prove "lacks substantial merit," the preliminary injunction should not issue.

Harvard University

The Supreme Court ruled then that Sony was not liable because the equipment had "substantial" uses other than infringement, such as the recording of TV programmes for later viewing.

The Economist

In answering that question, we must distinguish between whether there is a high enough degree of similarity between the works to establish copying, and whether that copying is substantial enough to constitute infringement.

Harvard University

2 171 (copyrightability of characters is "more properly framed as relating to the degree of substantial similarity required to constitute infringement rather than in terms of copyrightability per se").

Harvard University

We therefore interpret the district court's conclusions as determining that Amazon had demonstrated a substantial likelihood of establishing literal infringement of the enumerated claims.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal matters, use "substantial infringement" to denote a significant violation of rights, especially in copyright or patent law, ensuring clarity and precision in your language.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial infringement" in casual conversations. It is a term best reserved for legal or formal discussions where the degree and significance of the infringement are critical.

Linguistic Context

Noun phrase functioning as a legal term. "Substantial infringement" typically acts as the object of a verb, describing a significant violation, as evidenced in the Ludwig examples. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in formal English, especially in legal contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "substantial infringement" is a noun phrase used to describe a significant violation of rights, most commonly in legal contexts related to copyright or patent law. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and appropriate for formal use. It is mostly found in news, media and academic sources and more rarely in science, encyclopedias and wikis. If you need alternatives, consider "significant violation" or "major transgression". To use the phrase correctly, reserve it for formal discussions or legal arguments where precision and clarity are essential. Remember, avoiding overuse in casual contexts will maintain its impact. It's important to understand what evidence is needed to prove "substantial infringement" and what defenses can be raised, ensuring you're well-prepared for any legal discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

material infringement

Highlights infringement that would likely affect the outcome of a legal matter.

significant violation

Focuses on the severity of the breach rather than specifically the infringement aspect.

grave infringement

Highlights the seriousness and potential consequences of the infringement.

major transgression

Emphasizes the act of wrongdoing and its scale.

serious violation

General term emphasizing the severity of the violation.

serious breach

Highlights the breaking of a rule or law, indicating gravity.

extensive violation

Underscores the breadth and reach of the infringement.

flagrant breach

Indicates a blatant and intentional violation.

considerable encroachment

Focuses on the act of intruding or trespassing significantly.

egregious violation

Points out the shocking and blatant nature of the violation.

FAQs

How is "substantial infringement" typically determined in copyright law?

Courts often consider factors such as the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, the nature of the copyrighted work, and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

What are some synonyms for "substantial infringement"?

You can use alternatives such as "significant violation", "major transgression", or "serious breach" depending on the context.

What kind of evidence is needed to prove "substantial infringement" in court?

Evidence may include direct proof of copying, access to the copyrighted work by the defendant, and demonstration of substantial similarity between the original work and the allegedly infringing work.

What defenses might be raised against a claim of "substantial infringement"?

Potential defenses include fair use, independent creation, lack of originality in the original work, or that the portion copied was not a substantial part of the original work.