Sentence examples for substantial harm that from inspiring English sources

"We need not decide, however, whether Microsoft's objections constitute a 'substantial question' likely to lead to Supreme Court review, because Microsoft has failed to demonstrate any substantial harm that would result from the reactivation of the proceeding in the district court".

In its response to the committee's report, the government agreed to replace the test of "substantial harm" to reputation with a stricter test of "serious harm" that would have to be established in defamation cases.

The substantial harm to innocent people that could result from the misuse of DNA greatly outweighs the benefits.

Any other interpretation risks substantial harm of the sort that my sleeping pill example illustrates.

To deny a request, officials will have to be able to prove to the commissioner that substantial harm would result from the release of information.Inevitably there are exemptions and exclusions.

"In instructing Mr. Roy to get back in the truck constituted wanton and reckless conduct by Ms. Carter, creating a situation where there is a high degree of likelihood that substantial harm will result to Mr. Roy," Moniz told the court.

"Instructing Mr. Roy to get back in the truck constituted wanton and reckless conduct by Ms. Carter, creating a situation where there is a high degree of likelihood that substantial harm will result to Mr. Roy," Moniz told the court at the verdict hearing June 16.

We begin with a set of individual and public interests that merit protection, given their role in human welfare: they can be protected by various methods, including various state activities; a system of criminal law makes its distinctive contribution to their protection by forbidding and thus preventing conduct that threatens substantial harm to them.

Burt, who is a professor of evolutionary genetics at Imperial College, in London, suggested, for the first time, that scientists might deploy "selfish" genes to alter or eradicate species that "cause substantial harm to the human condition".

On March 26th, the vice-president of campus life told W.P. in a letter that his enrollment would pose an "unacceptably high risk of substantial harm to your health and safety that cannot be mitigated by any reasonable modifications".

The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit has already ruled in the case of Terry L. Nichols that no substantial harm was caused when the prosecution previously withheld more than 35,000 other documents about the Oklahoma City bombing.