The phrase 'substantial framework' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a well-developed structure, such as the framework of a legal system, a set of rules, or a plan for accomplishing an aim. For example, "The government has developed a substantial framework for regulating the finance sector".
Having a substantial framework for national cooperation is a headstart to resolving those issues.
Negotiating teams have continued to work on technical details, and when trade officials gather in Quebec, a substantial framework for the trade negotiations leading to a 2005 deal will be in place.
The cross-platform and open standard-based features of DotDFS provide a substantial framework for unifying data access and resource sharing in real heterogeneous Grid environments.
Perhaps most importantly, thinking about socionics provides a substantial conceptual framework for thinking about questions of personality, social behavior, cognition, and philosophy.
After the session, Sir Menzies Campbell, a Liberal Democrat member of the ISC, also called for a review of the law, "not least to provide the public with a sense of reassurance and confidence that there is a substantial legal framework".
The brush parks are constructed in a variety of forms and sizes, but basically a brush park consists of an inner core, or concentric circles, of densely packed tree branches or other material surrounded by an outer, more substantial wooden framework which is fished periodically, usually by encirclement.
The development and application of substantial theoretical frameworks, and a better delineation of the nature of STEM integration programs, including how evidence for learning is gathered and the types of learning supports provided, are also essential to advancing the field.
This primordial soup of rights-based ideology and dialogue resulted in the birth of the United Nations, and subsequently a handful of substantial treaties, frameworks, and guiding principles for our quest to define and maintain human rights globally.
The internationally accepted substantial equivalence (SE) framework [1], [2] proposes to begin risk assessment of genetically-modified (GM) organisms by comparing them with traditional varieties.
In essence, even though that study was designed to compare the dominant and alternative frameworks, in the end it showed that individual differences were so substantial that no single framework was likely to describe the learning process well for everyone.
From the point of view of European cooperation, there are so many good reasons why substantial changes to the framework should pass through proper democratic processes.
