Exact(9)
It is harshly dismissive of the "occult qualities, intentional species, substantial forms, and a thousand other trifles" (letter 60, to Boxel) of pre-revolutionary scholastic natural philosophy.
In the Meteorology, he also proclaimed that his natural philosophy had no need for the "substantial forms" and "real qualities" that other philosophers "imagine to be in bodies" (6:239).
Although in the World and Meteorology Descartes avoided outright denial of substantial forms and real qualities, it is clear that he intended to deny them (1 324; 2:200; 3:420, 500, 648).
It was posited against the prevailing Peripatetic view which made reference to such things as substantial forms and prime matter in order to explain the permanence underlying the continuous change that matter undergoes.
This view is not committed to any "plurality" of substantial forms, and is not committed to universal hylomorphism either.[27] The issues here are complex and the historical facts are not yet well sorted out.
He is however mostly associated with Augustinian thought, especially on the plurality of substantial forms and the active nature of perception, and through his involvement in the controversy surrounding the Prohibitions in 1277 of thirty articles on logic, grammar, and natural philosophy.
Similar(51)
But what is the relation between the substantial form and those properties?
The others are (ii) what is the relationship between the substantial form and the properties which enter into its definition?
The task, then, is to determine what kind of parts form and matter are, and especially what kind of parts substantial form and matter are.
Others, and most famously Aquinas and his followers, hold that a living thing can only have one substantial form and therefore only one soul (Pasnau 2002, 126 30).
This could suggest a reading of Aristotle that assumed an essential fixity of each definable substantial form, and the eternity of each species since creation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com