substantial forfeiture

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial forfeiture" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts involving legal, financial, or contractual discussions where significant loss or surrender of rights or property is being described. Example: "The contract included a clause that stipulated substantial forfeiture of the deposit if the terms were not met."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Another substantial forfeiture case last year involved Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars, two large online poker Web sites.

The New York Times

The settlements with the five banks generally included deferred prosecution agreements along with a substantial forfeiture of assets comparable in size to the basket of illegal transactions the banks engaged in.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Under a transition rule, amounts earned before 2018 would be includable in income in 2026 or the year the amounts are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Forbes

"While the negative impact on our society of trafficking in illegal drugs is substantial," the court noted, "a forfeiture of approximately four times the maximum monetary fine is disproportional to Tyson's illegal conduct". When the state appealed the decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals also ruled in Timbs' favor.

Forbes

Furthermore, considering Guion is facing substantial drug charges, prosecutors could also seek criminal forfeiture of the cash -- a separate legal process in which adoption would be linked to the outcome of the criminal trial.

Huffington Post

In Wednesday's claim, filed on behalf of Berkeley by the Drug Policy Alliance, the city is attempting to intercede in the forfeiture action by saying it stands to lose "substantial revenue" if Berkeley Patients Group is shuttered.

Los Angeles Times

(c) Failure to demonstrate that substantial service is being provided in the service area will result in forfeiture of the license, and will result in the licensee's ineligibility to apply for 218-219 MHz Service licenses for three years from the date the Commission takes final action affirming that the 218-219 MHz Service license has been canceled pursuant to § 95.1913 of this part.

Cornell University

The decision to incorporate the Excessive Fines Clause and the guidelines for applying that incorporation would have a substantial effect on governments, which often rely on the revenue gained from forfeiture.

Duke University

A forfeiture hearing to be held on Wednesday could cost Mr. Edwards, a Democrat, a substantial amount of cash and property as well.

The New York Times

Civil forfeiture is different.

The Economist

Seizure and forfeiture authority.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantial forfeiture", ensure the context clearly defines what is being forfeited, such as assets, rights, or privileges, to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial forfeiture" when a smaller or less significant forfeiture is meant. The adjective "substantial" implies a considerable amount or value, so using it inappropriately can be misleading.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial forfeiture" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It identifies a specific instance of losing something of considerable value or significance. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in contexts where legal and financial implications are relevant.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Academia

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantial forfeiture" is a grammatically sound noun phrase used to describe the significant loss of assets, rights, or property. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in formal contexts involving legal, financial, or contractual discussions. While relatively rare in overall usage, it is most commonly found in News & Media and Academia sources. When using the term, ensure the context clearly specifies what is being forfeited. Alternatives such as "significant forfeiture" or "major asset forfeiture" may be considered depending on the nuances you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant forfeiture

Replaces "substantial" with "significant" to emphasize the importance of the forfeiture.

major asset forfeiture

Specifies that the forfeiture involves assets and uses "major" instead of "substantial".

considerable loss of assets

Shifts the focus to the loss of assets, using "considerable" to indicate the size of the loss.

significant asset seizure

Replaces forfeiture with seizure and emphasizes that assets were involved.

large-scale confiscation

Uses "confiscation" to highlight the act of taking assets, describing it as "large-scale".

material deprivation of property

Focuses on the deprivation of property, using "material" to show significance.

extensive asset relinquishment

Highlights the relinquishment of assets, emphasizing its extensiveness.

notable loss of entitlements

Shifts the focus to entitlements being lost, characterizing the loss as "notable".

significant deprivation of rights

Emphasizes the loss of rights, using "significant" to convey the scale of deprivation.

major financial penalty

Broadens the concept to financial penalties, indicating they are substantial.

FAQs

What does "substantial forfeiture" mean in legal terms?

In legal contexts, "substantial forfeiture" refers to the significant loss of assets, rights, or property as a penalty or consequence of legal action or contractual breach.

Are there synonyms for "substantial forfeiture" that I can use?

Yes, you can use alternatives like "significant forfeiture", "major asset forfeiture", or "considerable loss of assets" depending on the context.

How is "substantial forfeiture" different from a regular forfeiture?

The term "substantial" emphasizes that the forfeiture is of a large or significant amount, distinguishing it from minor or inconsequential forfeitures. The key difference lies in the magnitude of what is being lost.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the term "substantial forfeiture"?

"Substantial forfeiture" is typically used in legal, financial, or contractual discussions when describing the significant loss or surrender of rights or property as a result of failing to meet specific obligations or legal requirements.