Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
substantial experience in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "substantial experience in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a significant or notable amount of experience in a certain subject or field. For example, "The applicant had substantial experience in accounting, which made him a strong candidate for the job."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
"We have substantial experience in Sweden," he said.
News & Media
He added that Anthem and WellPoint both "have substantial experience in making acquisitions work".
News & Media
He's supported by a strong team with substantial experience in construction, recruitment and finance.
News & Media
But Mr Kobert says he was instructed because of his "substantial experience in litigating foreign sovereign immunity issues".
News & Media
Christos brings substantial experience in fashion retailing in both the UK and USA and the board will benefit from his knowledge and insight".
News & Media
Other prospects do not meet Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, which call for audit committee members to have substantial experience in overseeing financial statements.
News & Media
Robert Horan, the commonwealth's attorney in Fairfax County, and Paul B. Ebert, his counterpart in Prince William County, are regarded as seasoned and effective advocates with substantial experience in death penalty cases.
News & Media
Moody's Investors Service rated the bonds, known as pass-through certificates, from Aaa to A1, saying, "Triple Five Properties offers a strong management team, with substantial experience in the management and ownership of megaregional malls".
News & Media
In Northumbria, the NHS has recently launched an 18-month work-based programme of nurse training for students with a previous record of academic study and substantial experience in the health sector.
News & Media
A soldier with two stints at American staff colleges and substantial experience in government, Mr. Yudhoyono is Indonesia's first professionally qualified president in the six years since the fall of Suharto.
News & Media
The same day that Stewart met with Iossifidis, Tariq Ali, an American-educated banker with substantial experience in debt restructuring, met in Khobar with Jamal al-Muzein, a lawyer representing Sanea.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing someone's qualifications, use "substantial experience in" to emphasize a notable and meaningful level of expertise. For example, "She has "substantial experience in" project management, making her an ideal candidate."
Common error
Avoid using "substantial experience in" without providing specific details or examples. Instead of saying "He has "substantial experience in" IT", specify the areas within IT where he excels, such as "network security" or "database management".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "substantial experience in" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. It indicates a significant amount of practical knowledge or skill acquired through involvement in a specific field or activity. Ludwig AI confirms its accurate and usable nature in written English.
Frequent in
Science
39%
News & Media
35%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "substantial experience in" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase that signifies a significant amount of practical knowledge or skill in a specific area. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriate usage in formal writing. It is most frequently found in scientific and news contexts, emphasizing competence and qualifications. While alternatives like "considerable experience in" or "significant experience in" exist, the key is to provide specific details to avoid vagueness. The phrase is suitable for professional and neutral registers, making it versatile for various contexts.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
considerable experience in
Replaces "substantial" with "considerable", indicating a large amount of experience.
significant experience in
Substitutes "substantial" with "significant", highlighting the importance of the experience.
extensive background in
Uses "extensive background" instead of "substantial experience", changing the noun while keeping a similar meaning.
deep expertise in
Replaces "substantial experience" with "deep expertise", focusing on the depth of knowledge.
proven track record in
Shifts the focus to a history of success rather than just experience.
years of experience in
Quantifies the experience, making it more specific.
well-versed in
Indicates a thorough knowledge and experience, differing slightly in emphasis.
highly proficient in
Focuses on the skill level achieved through experience.
seasoned in
Implies experience gained over a significant period, adding a sense of maturity.
broad exposure to
Highlights the variety of experiences rather than the depth in one specific area.
FAQs
How can I use "substantial experience in" in a sentence?
Use "substantial experience in" to highlight someone's notable expertise or involvement in a particular area. For example, "The candidate possesses "substantial experience in" data analysis."
What are some alternatives to saying "substantial experience in"?
You can use alternatives like "considerable experience in", "significant experience in", or "extensive background in" depending on the context.
Is it better to quantify experience rather than using "substantial experience in"?
Quantifying experience, such as "five years of experience", can be more specific, but "substantial experience in" emphasizes the depth and quality of that experience, which can be more impactful in certain contexts.
What's the difference between "substantial experience in" and "substantial expertise in"?
"Substantial experience in" implies practical involvement and learning over time, while "substantial expertise in" suggests a high level of knowledge and skill. They are similar but emphasize different aspects: doing versus knowing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested